Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31758045›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

An epigenetic screening determines BET proteins as targets to suppress self-renewal and tumorigenicity in canine mammary cancer cells.

Pedro L P Xavier, Yonara G Cordeiro, Pâmela A Alexandre, Pedro R L Pires, Bruno H Saranholi, Edson R Silva, Susanne Müller, Heidge Fukumasu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Regulation of Embryonic Stem Cell Self-Renewal.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  7. Epigenetic alterations in canine mammary cancer.Genetics and molecular biology · 2022
    Article
  8. Epigenetic Mechanisms in Canine Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Pedro L P XavierLaboratory of Comparative and Translational Oncology (LOCT), Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of Sao Paulo, Pirassununga, Brazil.
Yonara G CordeiroLaboratory of Comparative and Translational Oncology (LOCT), Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of Sao Paulo, Pirassununga, Brazil.
Pâmela A AlexandreLaboratory of Comparative and Translational Oncology (LOCT), Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of Sao Paulo, Pirassununga, Brazil.
Pedro R L PiresLaboratory of Comparative and Translational Oncology (LOCT), Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of Sao Paulo, Pirassununga, Brazil.
Bruno H SaranholiDepartment of Genetics and Evolution, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8221-3557
Edson R SilvaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of Sao Paulo, Pirassununga, Brazil.
Susanne MüllerStructural Genomics Consortium, Buchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2402-4157
Heidge FukumasuLaboratory of Comparative and Translational Oncology (LOCT), Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of Sao Paulo, Pirassununga, Brazil. fukumasu@usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3265-5090
Universidade de São Paulo · BRCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUGoethe University Frankfurt · DEUniversidade Federal de São Carlos · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeting self-renewal and tumorigenicity has been proposed as a potential strategy against cancer stem cells (CSCs). Epigenetic proteins are key modulators of gene expression and cancer development contributing to regulation and maintenance of self-renewal and tumorigenicity. Here, we have screened a small-molecule epigenetic inhibitor library using 3D in vitro models in order to determine potential epigenetic targets associated with self-renewal and tumorigenicity in Canine Mammary Cancer (CMC) cells. We identified inhibition of BET proteins as a promising strategy to inhibit CMC colonies and tumorspheres formation. Low doses of (+)-JQ1 were able to downregulate important genes associated to self-renewal pathways such as WNT, NOTCH, Hedgehog, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, EGF receptor and FGF receptor in CMC tumorspheres. In addition, we observed downregulation of ZEB2, a transcription factor important for the maintenance of self-renewal in canine mammary cancer cells. Furthermore, low doses of (+)-JQ1 were not cytotoxic in CMC cells cultured in 2D in vitro models but induced G2/M cell cycle arrest accompanied by upregulation of G2/M checkpoint-associated genes including BTG2 and CCNG2. Our work indicates the BET inhibition as a new strategy for canine mammary cancers by modulating the self-renewal phenotype in tumorigenic cells such as CSCs.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsAzepinesBiomarkers, TumorCarcinogenesisCell ProliferationDog DiseasesDogsEnzyme InhibitorsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenetic TestingIndazolesMammary Neoplasms, AnimalAntineoplastic AgentsAzepinesBiomarkers, TumorEnzyme InhibitorsGSK343Indazoles(+)-JQ1 compoundPyridonesTranscription FactorsTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID31758045
PMCPMC6874531
OpenAlexW2990996080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.