Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31758028›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Relative contributions to vergence eye movements of two binocular cues for motion-in-depth.

Martin Giesel, Alexandra Yakovleva, Marina Bloj, Alex R Wade, Anthony M Norcia, Julie M Harris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Martin GieselSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK. martin.giesel@abdn.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3832-7442
Alexandra YakovlevaDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Marina BlojSchool of Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9251-0750
Alex R WadeDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0656-2664
Anthony M NorciaDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5471-3821
Julie M HarrisSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3497-4503

Funding

Disparity processing in visual cortexR01EY018875 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI NORCIA, ANTHONY M · 2008 to 2021
$4.6M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M002543/1NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018875RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/M001660/1RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/MM001210/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When we track an object moving in depth, our eyes rotate in opposite directions. This type of "disjunctive" eye movement is called horizontal vergence. The sensory control signals for vergence arise from multiple visual cues, two of which, changing binocular disparity (CD) and inter-ocular velocity differences (IOVD), are specifically binocular. While it is well known that the CD cue triggers horizontal vergence eye movements, the role of the IOVD cue has only recently been explored. To better understand the relative contribution of CD and IOVD cues in driving horizontal vergence, we recorded vergence eye movements from ten observers in response to four types of stimuli that isolated or combined the two cues to motion-in-depth, using stimulus conditions and CD/IOVD stimuli typical of behavioural motion-in-depth experiments. An analysis of the slopes of the vergence traces and the consistency of the directions of vergence and stimulus movements showed that under our conditions IOVD cues provided very little input to vergence mechanisms. The eye movements that did occur coinciding with the presentation of IOVD stimuli were likely not a response to stimulus motion, but a phoria initiated by the absence of a disparity signal.

Indexed as

CuesDepth PerceptionEye MovementsMotion PerceptionVision, BinocularFemaleHumansMaleModels, TheoreticalMotionPhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID31758028
PMCPMC6874608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.