ArticleScientific reports2019
Identification of two novel breast cancer loci through large-scale genome-wide association study in the Japanese population.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- A multi-tissue, splicing-based joint transcriptome-wide association study identifies susceptibility genes for breast cancer.American journal of human genetics · 2024Article
- Plasma cell signatures predict prognosis and treatment efficacy for lung adenocarcinoma.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2024Article
- Evaluation of SNPs associated with mammographic density in European women with mammographic density in Asian women from South-East Asia.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2023Article
- Functional annotation of breast cancer risk loci: current progress and future directions.British journal of cancer · 2022Review
- The Clinical and Theranostic Values of Activated Leukocyte Cell Adhesion Molecule (ALCAM)/CD166 in Human Solid Cancers.Cancers · 2021Review
- A Personal Breast Cancer Risk Stratification Model Using Common Variants and Environmental Risk Factors in Japanese Females.Cancers · 2021Article
- A seven-gene prognostic signature predicts overall survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD).Cancer cell international · 2021Article
- Cancer health disparities in racial/ethnic minorities in the United States.British journal of cancer · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have successfully identified about 70 genomic loci associated with breast cancer. Owing to the complexity of linkage disequilibrium and environmental exposures in different populations, it is essential to perform regional GWAS for better risk prediction. This study aimed to investigate the genetic architecture and to assess common genetic risk model of breast cancer with 6,669 breast cancer patients and 21,930 female controls in the Japanese population. This GWAS identified 11 genomic loci that surpass genome-wide significance threshold of P < 5.0 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.