Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31757951›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Functional analysis of genetic variants in the high-risk breast cancer susceptibility gene PALB2.

Rick A C M Boonen, Amélie Rodrigue, Chantal Stoepker, Wouter W Wiegant, Bas Vroling, Milan Sharma, Magdalena B Rother, Nandi Celosse, Maaike P G Vreeswijk, Fergus Couch and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Proline variants in the BRCA1 coiled-coil domain disrupt folding and binding to PALB2.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Molecular medicine reports · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Rick A C M BoonenDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2333 ZC, The Netherlands.
Amélie RodrigueCHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Oncology Division, Québec City, QC, G1R 3S3, Canada.
Chantal StoepkerDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2333 ZC, The Netherlands.
Wouter W WiegantDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2333 ZC, The Netherlands.
Bas VrolingBio-Prodict, Nijmegen, 6511 AA, The Netherlands.
Milan SharmaDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2333 ZC, The Netherlands.
Magdalena B RotherDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2333 ZC, The Netherlands.
Nandi CelosseDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2333 ZC, The Netherlands.
Maaike P G VreeswijkDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2333 ZC, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4068-9271
Fergus CouchDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Jacques SimardCHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Oncology Division, Québec City, QC, G1R 3S3, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6906-3390
Peter DevileeDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2333 ZC, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8023-2009
Jean-Yves MassonCHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Oncology Division, Québec City, QC, G1R 3S3, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4403-7169
Haico van AttikumDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2333 ZC, The Netherlands. h.van.attikum@lumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8590-0240
Leiden University Medical Center · NLUniversité Laval · CABio-Prodict (Netherlands) · NLCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec · CAMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heterozygous carriers of germ-line loss-of-function variants in the DNA repair gene PALB2 are at a highly increased lifetime risk for developing breast cancer. While truncating variants in PALB2 are known to increase cancer risk, the interpretation of missense variants of uncertain significance (VUS) is in its infancy. Here we describe the development of a relatively fast and easy cDNA-based system for the semi high-throughput functional analysis of 48 VUS in human PALB2. By assessing the ability of PALB2 VUS to rescue the DNA repair and checkpoint defects in Palb2 knockout mouse embryonic stem (mES) cells, we identify various VUS in PALB2 that impair its function. Three VUS in the coiled-coil domain of PALB2 abrogate the interaction with BRCA1, whereas several VUS in the WD40 domain dramatically reduce protein stability. Thus, our functional assays identify damaging VUS in PALB2 that may increase cancer risk.

Indexed as

Genetic TechniquesMutation, MissenseAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsDNA, ComplementaryFanconi Anemia Complementation Group N ProteinFlow CytometryGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenomic InstabilityHumansMiceMice, KnockoutMouse Embryonic Stem CellsMutant ProteinsDNA, ComplementaryFanconi Anemia Complementation Group N ProteinMutant ProteinsPALB2 protein, humanPalb2 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID31757951
PMCPMC6876638
OpenAlexW2990517165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.