ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2020
A Genetic Screen To Identify Genes Influencing the Secondary Redox Couple NADPH/NADP
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrated amplification of NADPH-regenerating modules enhances cytidine biosynthesis inSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026Article
- Integrated analysis of transcriptome sequencing and metabolomics provides insights into the molecular response ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Interactions of Linalool and Linalyl Acetate with Selected Dog Cytochrome P450 (CYP) Proteins Identified by In Silico Drug Discovery Followed by Molecular Docking Analysis.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase variants increase NADPH pools for yeast isoprenoid production.FEBS open bio · 2024Article
- Allosteric inhibition of MTHFR prevents futile SAM cycling and maintains nucleotide pools in one-carbon metabolism.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
NADPH is an important cofactor in the cell. In addition to its role in the biosynthesis of critical metabolites, it plays crucial roles in the regeneration of the reduced forms of glutathione, thioredoxins and peroxiredoxins. The enzymes and pathways that regulate NADPH are thus extremely important to understand, and yet are only partially understood. We have been interested in understanding how NADPH fluxes are altered in the cell. We describe here both an assay and a genetic screen that allows one to discern changes in NADPH levels. The screen exploits the secondary redox property of NADPH. At low levels of glutathione we show that the redox contributions of NADPH become critical for growth, and we have used this to develop a genetic screen for genes affecting NADPH homeostasis. The screen was validated in pathways that both directly (pentose phosphate pathway) and indirectly (glycolytic pathway) affect NADPH levels, and was then exploited to identify mitochondrial genes that affect NADPH homeostasis. A total of 239 mitochondrial gene knockouts were assayed using this screen. Among these, several genes were predicted to play a role in NADPH homeostasis. This included several new genes of unknown function, and others of poorly defined function. We examined two of these genes, FMP40 which encodes a protein required during oxidative stress and GOR1, glyoxylate reductase. Our studies throw new light on these proteins that appear to be major consumers of NADPH in the cell. The genetic screen is thus predicted to be an exceedingly useful tool for investigating NADPH homeostasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.