Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31757816›Full record

ArticleNeurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation2020

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders with unevenly clustered attack occurrence.

Tetsuya Akaishi, Ichiro Nakashima, Toshiyuki Takahashi, Michiaki Abe, Tadashi Ishii, Masashi Aoki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tetsuya AkaishiFrom the Department of Neurology (T.A., T.T., M.A.), Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan; Department of Education and Support for Regional Medicine (T.A., M.A., T.I.), Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan; Department of Neurology (I.N.), Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan; and Department of Neurology (T.T.), National Hospital Organization Yonezawa National Hospital, Yonezawa, Japan. t-akaishi@med.tohoku.ac.jp.
Ichiro NakashimaFrom the Department of Neurology (T.A., T.T., M.A.), Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan; Department of Education and Support for Regional Medicine (T.A., M.A., T.I.), Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan; Department of Neurology (I.N.), Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan; and Department of Neurology (T.T.), National Hospital Organization Yonezawa National Hospital, Yonezawa, Japan.
Toshiyuki TakahashiFrom the Department of Neurology (T.A., T.T., M.A.), Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan; Department of Education and Support for Regional Medicine (T.A., M.A., T.I.), Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan; Department of Neurology (I.N.), Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan; and Department of Neurology (T.T.), National Hospital Organization Yonezawa National Hospital, Yonezawa, Japan.
Michiaki AbeFrom the Department of Neurology (T.A., T.T., M.A.), Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan; Department of Education and Support for Regional Medicine (T.A., M.A., T.I.), Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan; Department of Neurology (I.N.), Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan; and Department of Neurology (T.T.), National Hospital Organization Yonezawa National Hospital, Yonezawa, Japan.
Tadashi IshiiFrom the Department of Neurology (T.A., T.T., M.A.), Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan; Department of Education and Support for Regional Medicine (T.A., M.A., T.I.), Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan; Department of Neurology (I.N.), Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan; and Department of Neurology (T.T.), National Hospital Organization Yonezawa National Hospital, Yonezawa, Japan.
Masashi AokiFrom the Department of Neurology (T.A., T.T., M.A.), Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan; Department of Education and Support for Regional Medicine (T.A., M.A., T.I.), Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan; Department of Neurology (I.N.), Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan; and Department of Neurology (T.T.), National Hospital Organization Yonezawa National Hospital, Yonezawa, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to elucidate the characteristics of clinical attacks in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSDs) with positive serum anti-aquaporin-4 antibody. Both the timing and sequential pattern of clinical types were analyzed.

methodsA total of 69 patients with NMOSD were enrolled in this study, all of whom were treated at a single university hospital. All data regarding the clinical attacks (including types and date) together with other clinical information were collected.

resultsAnalysis of clinical attacks from the enrolled patients showed that there were 2 distributional patterns of attack occurrence in each patient: (1) "clustered" occurrences, which occurred within 12 months from the previous attack, and (2) "nonclustered" intermittent occurrences, which occurred ≥12 months after the previous attack. These occurrences were regardless of the duration from the onset. During the "clustered" period, clinical attacks were more likely to show a similar clinical manifestation, such as optic neuritis or myelitis. After entering the "nonclustered" intermittent period, the relapses were of random clinical type, regardless of the previous clinical manifestation.

conclusionsPatients with NMOSD showed mixed periods of "clustered" occurrence with frequent attacks presenting with similar manifestations and "nonclustered" intermittent periods with sparse relapses. Approximately half of the relapses occurred during the "clustered" period within 12 months of the last clinical attack. Clinicians should pay special attention to whether the patients are presently in the "clustered" or "nonclustered" period to decide optimal relapse-preventive strategies.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionAdultAquaporin 4FemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuromyelitis OpticaRecurrenceAQP4 protein, humanAquaporin 4

Identifiers

PMID31757816
PMCPMC6935841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.