Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31757301›Full record

ReviewThe Urologic clinics of North America2020

Heated Intravesical Chemotherapy: Biology and Clinical Utility.

Wei Phin Tan, Thomas A Longo, Brant A Inman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Urologic clinics of North America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Inherited Germline Cancer Susceptibility Gene Variants in Individuals with Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Safety and efficacy of intravesical chemotherapy and hyperthermia in the bladder: results of a porcine study.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wei Phin TanDivision of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Thomas A LongoDivision of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Brant A InmanDivision of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Electronic address: brant.inman@duke.edu.

Funding

Viral Oncology Training GrantT32CA009111 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LUFTIG, MICAH A. · 1985 to 2023
$8.9M
Translational Research in Surgical OncologyT32CA093245 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ALLEN, PETER J, HARPOLE, DAVID H. · 2002 to 2020
$5.2M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009111NCI NIH HHS T32 CA093245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer can be a challenging disease to manage. In recent years, hyperthermia therapy in conjunction with intravesical therapy has been gaining traction as a treatment option for bladder cancer, especially if Bacillus Calmette-Guerin might not be available. Trials of intravesical chemotherapy with heat are few and there has been considerable heterogeneity between studies. However, multiple new trials have accrued and high-quality data are forthcoming. In this review, we discuss the role of combined intravesical hyperthermia and chemotherapy as a novel approach for the treatment of bladder cancer.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravesicalAntibiotics, AntineoplasticHumansHyperthermia, InducedMitomycinTreatment OutcomeUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAntibiotics, AntineoplasticMitomycinBladder hyperthermiaHeated chemotherapyHeated mitomycinHIVECIntravesical chemotherapyIntravesical mitomycin

Identifiers

PMID31757301
PMCPMC6917042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.