Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31757205›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019

ImaGene: a convolutional neural network to quantify natural selection from genomic data.

Luis Torada, Lucrezia Lorenzon, Alice Beddis, Ulas Isildak, Linda Pattini, Sara Mathieson, Matteo Fumagalli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The persistence and loss of hard selective sweeps amid admixture in ancient Eurasians.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Coalescence and translation: A language model for population genetics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Neural posterior estimation for population genetics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luis ToradaDepartment of Life Sciences, Silwood Park campus, Imperial College London, Buckhurst Road, Ascot, SL5 7PY, UK.
Lucrezia LorenzonDepartment of Life Sciences, Silwood Park campus, Imperial College London, Buckhurst Road, Ascot, SL5 7PY, UK.
Alice BeddisDepartment of Life Sciences, Silwood Park campus, Imperial College London, Buckhurst Road, Ascot, SL5 7PY, UK.
Ulas IsildakDepartment of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University, METU Üniversiteler Mah. Dumlupınar Blv. No:1, Ankara, 06800 Çankaya, Turkey.
Linda PattiniDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, Milan, 20133, Italy.
Sara MathiesonDepartment of Computer Science, Swarthmore College, 500 College Ave, Swarthmore, 19081, PA, USA.
Matteo FumagalliDepartment of Life Sciences, Silwood Park campus, Imperial College London, Buckhurst Road, Ascot, SL5 7PY, UK. m.fumagalli@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4084-2953

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe genetic bases of many complex phenotypes are still largely unknown, mostly due to the polygenic nature of the traits and the small effect of each associated mutation. An alternative approach to classic association studies to determining such genetic bases is an evolutionary framework. As sites targeted by natural selection are likely to harbor important functionalities for the carrier, the identification of selection signatures in the genome has the potential to unveil the genetic mechanisms underpinning human phenotypes. Popular methods of detecting such signals rely on compressing genomic information into summary statistics, resulting in the loss of information. Furthermore, few methods are able to quantify the strength of selection. Here we explored the use of deep learning in evolutionary biology and implemented a program, called ImaGene, to apply convolutional neural networks on population genomic data for the detection and quantification of natural selection.

resultsImaGene enables genomic information from multiple individuals to be represented as abstract images. Each image is created by stacking aligned genomic data and encoding distinct alleles into separate colors. To detect and quantify signatures of positive selection, ImaGene implements a convolutional neural network which is trained using simulations. We show how the method implemented in ImaGene can be affected by data manipulation and learning strategies. In particular, we show how sorting images by row and column leads to accurate predictions. We also demonstrate how the misspecification of the correct demographic model for producing training data can influence the quantification of positive selection. We finally illustrate an approach to estimate the selection coefficient, a continuous variable, using multiclass classification techniques.

conclusionsWhile the use of deep learning in evolutionary genomics is in its infancy, here we demonstrated its potential to detect informative patterns from large-scale genomic data. We implemented methods to process genomic data for deep learning in a user-friendly program called ImaGene. The joint inference of the evolutionary history of mutations and their functional impact will facilitate mapping studies and provide novel insights into the molecular mechanisms associated with human phenotypes.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticNeural Networks, ComputerSelection, GeneticSoftwareAlgorithmsAllelesGenetics, PopulationGenomicsHumansPhenotypeConvolutional neural networksNatural selectionPopulation geneticsSupervised machine learning

Identifiers

PMID31757205
PMCPMC6873651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.