Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31756279›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of health psychology2020

Forms, interactions, and responses to social support: A qualitative study of support and adherence to photoprotection amongst patients with Xeroderma Pigmentosum.

Jessica Walburn, Rebecca Anderson, Myfanwy Morgan

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of health psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Exploring the perceived impact of social support on the health behaviours of people living with and beyond cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessica WalburnFaculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7396-0182
Rebecca AndersonFaculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7095-8914
Myfanwy MorganFaculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5532-8941
King's College London · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-1212-20009Marie Curie MCCC-FCO-11-U
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSocial support influences adherence to treatment in chronic illness, but there is uncertainty about its facilitators and constraints. This study explored the forms, processes, and responses associated with mobilization of informal support across three life contexts amongst patients with Xeroderma Pigmentosum (XP), a condition requiring rigorous photoprotection to reduce cancer risks.

designQualitative interview study.

methodsA total of 25 adults with XP participated in semi-structured interviews conducted face to face. An inductive thematic analysis was applied using a framework approach.

resultsPractical support, involving both assistance with recommended photoprotection and adjusting daily activities to reduce exposure, was the key form of support provided by family and friends. However, responses to this support differed with two groups identified based on the relative priority given to photoprotection in daily life and processes of disclosure. For 'positive responders', support aligned with their own priorities to photoprotect, conveyed feelings of being cared-for and was facilitated by talking openly. In contrast, for 'negative responders' support conflicted with their priority of living 'normally' and their limited disclosure hindered receipt of helpful support in personal, clinic, and work interactions. Fears of workplace stigma also reduced disclosure amongst participants open in other contexts.

conclusionsPractical support conveyed psychosocial support with positive effects on adherence. This suggests the traditional separation into practical and emotional support is overly simplistic, with measures potentially missing important aspects. Interactional processes contribute to the effects of support, which can be addressed by targeting disclosure, stigma, and other barriers at individual and organizational levels. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? Social support can be both a facilitator and a hindrance to treatment adherence. Practical support is identified as the most important form of support in the context of adherence. The processes of support underpinning its relationship to adherence are unclear. What does this study add? Variations in the provision and impacts of support are influenced by participants' disclosure and attitudes to photoprotection, with two key groups comprising 'positive responders' and 'negative responders'. The influence of emotional support on adherence may be underestimated through neglect of the ways in which practical support often conveys feelings of being valued and cared-for. Barriers to mobilizing effective adherence support extends across life spheres, with fears of stigma and discrimination in work settings highlighting the need to intervene at individual and organizational levels.

Indexed as

Social SupportAdolescentAdultFamilyFemaleFriendsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPatient ComplianceProtective ClothingQualitative ResearchSunscreening AgentsXeroderma PigmentosumYoung AdultSunscreening Agentsadherencedisclosureemotional supportphotoprotectionpractical supportqualitativesocial support

Identifiers

PMID31756279
PMCPMC7004138
OpenAlexW2989682489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.