Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31756225›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Quality of Kangaroo Mother Care services in Ethiopia: Implications for policy and practice.

Haftom Gebrehiwot Weldearegay, Araya Abrha Medhanyie, Mulugeta Woldu Abrha, Lisanu Tadesse, Ephrem Tekle, Bereket Yakob, Tsinuel Girma, Catherine Arsenault

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Haftom Gebrehiwot WeldearegayCollege of Health Sciences, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0003-1909-7853
Araya Abrha MedhanyieCollege of Health Sciences, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia.
Mulugeta Woldu AbrhaTigray Health Research Institute, Mekelle, Ethiopia.
Lisanu TadesseJSI, L10K and Federal Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Ephrem TekleMaternal and Child Health Directorate, Federal Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Bereket YakobDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Tsinuel GirmaDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Catherine ArsenaultDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2410-3015
Harvard Global Health Institute · USMekelle University · ETFederal Ministry of Health · ETGovernment of Ethiopia · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProviding high-quality kangaroo mother care (KMC) is a strategy proven to improve outcomes in premature babies. However, whether KMC is consistently and appropriately provided in Ethiopia is unclear. This study assesses the quality of KMC services in Ethiopia and the factors associated with its appropriate initiation among low birth weight neonates.

methodsWe used data from the 2016 national Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care (EmONC) assessment which contains data on all health facilities providing delivery care services in Ethiopia (N = 3,804). We described the quality of KMC services provided to low-birth weight (LBW) babies in terms of infrastructure, processes and outcomes (survival status at discharge). We also explored the factors associated with appropriate KMC initiation using multivariable logistic regression models.

resultsThe quality of KMC services in Ethiopia was poor. The facilities included scored only 59.0% on average on a basic index of service readiness. KMC was initiated for only 46.4% of all LBW babies included in the sample. Among those who received KMC, 66.7% survived, 13.3% died and 20.4% had no data on survival status at discharge. LBW babies born in health centers were twice more likely to receive KMC compared to those born in hospitals (AOR = 2.0, 95% CI: 1.3-3.0). Public facilities, those with a staff rotation policy in place for newborn care, and those with separate newborn corners were also more likely to initiate KMC for LBW babies.

conclusionsWe found low levels of appropriate KMC initiation, inadequate infrastructure and staffing, and poor survival among LBW babies in Ethiopia. Efforts must be made to improve the adoption of this life saving technique, particularly in hospitals and in the private sector where KMC remains underutilized. Facilities should also dedicate specific spaces for newborn care that enables mothers to provide KMC. In addition, improving record keeping and data quality for routine health data is a priority.

Indexed as

Infant MortalityQuality of Health CareEthiopiaFemaleHealth FacilitiesHealth PolicyHumansInfantInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureKangaroo-Mother Care MethodLogistic ModelsMaleSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID31756225
PMCPMC6874352
OpenAlexW2990970459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.