Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31756208›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Sex differences in youth elite swimming.

Jonathon W Senefeld, Andrew J Clayburn, Sarah E Baker, Rickey E Carter, Patrick W Johnson, Michael J Joyner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Sex hormones and menopause hormone therapy predict muscle strength across the lifespan.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. The ontogeny of sex differences in exercise performance.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Case Studies in Physiology: Male to female transgender swimmer in college athletics.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Sex-based limits to running speed in the human, horse and dog: The role of sexual dimorphisms.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonathon W SenefeldDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8116-3538
Andrew J ClayburnDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8729-1805
Sarah E BakerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Rickey E CarterDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0818-273X
Patrick W JohnsonDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States of America.
Michael J JoynerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe timing and magnitude of sex differences in athletic performance during early human development, prior to adulthood, is unknown.

objectiveTo compare swimming velocity of boys and girls for all Olympic-length freestyle swimming events to determine the age of divergence in swimming performance.

methodsWe collected the all-time top 100 U.S. freestyle swimming performance times of boys and girls age 5 to 18 years for the 50m to 1500m events.

resultsSwimming performance improved with increasing age for boys and girls (p<0.001) until reaching a plateau, which initiated at a younger age for girls (15 years) than boys (17 years; sex×age; p<0.001). Prior to age 10, the top 5 swimming records for girls were 3% faster than the top boys (p<0.001). For the 10th-50th places, however, there were no sex-related differences in swimming performance prior to age 10 (p = 0.227). For both the top 5 and 10th-50th places, the sex difference in performance increased from age 10 (top 5, 2.5%; 10th-50th places, 1.0%) until age 17 (top 5, 7.6%; 10th-50th places, 8.0%). For all places, the sex difference in performance at age 18 was larger for sprint events (9.6%; 50-200m) than endurance events (7.1%; 400-1500m; p<0.001). Additionally, the sex-related difference in performance increased across age and US ranking from 2.4% for 1st place to 4.3% for 100th place (p<0.001), indicating less depth of performance in girls than boys. However, annual participation was ~20% higher in girls than boys for all ages (p<0.001).

conclusionThe top 5 girls demonstrated faster swimming velocities and the 10th-50th place girls demonstrated similar swimming velocities than boys (until ~10 years). After age 10, however, boys demonstrated increasingly faster swimming velocities than girls until 17 years. Collectively, these data suggest girls are faster, or at least not slower, than boys prior to the performance-enhancing effects of puberty.

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceSwimmingAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleSex CharacteristicsTestosteroneTestosterone

Identifiers

PMID31756208
PMCPMC6874329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.