ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2019
Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Genotype-Specific Differences in Cortical Activation in Chronic Aphasia.
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of alterations in brain activation and intensity following stroke: implications for integration and functional outcomes.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- The Effectiveness of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) Paradigms as Treatment Options for Recovery of Language Deficits in Chronic Poststroke Aphasia.Behavioural neurology · 2022Trial
- Aphasia rehabilitation: a narrative review of adjuvant techniques.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Review
- Partial least squares multimodal analysis of brain network correlates of language deficits in aphasia.Brain communications · 2025Article
- The impact of brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene polymorphisms on post-stroke naming in aphasia.PloS one · 2025Article
- Under pressure: the interplay of hypertension and white matter hyperintensities with cognition in chronic stroke aphasia.Brain communications · 2024Article
- Possible Effects of Acupuncture in Poststroke Aphasia.Behavioural neurology · 2023Review
- Article
- Brain age predicts long-term recovery in post-stroke aphasia.Brain communications · 2022Article
- Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Polymorphism and Aphasia after Stroke.Behavioural neurology · 2021Review
- Neuroplasticity in post-stroke aphasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional imaging studies of reorganization of language processing.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2021Article
- Electrophysiological correlates of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) Val66Met polymorphism.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Introduction to the 2018 Research Symposium Forum.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose The brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene has been shown to be important for synaptic plasticity in animal models. Human research has suggested that BDNF genotype may influence stroke recovery. Some studies have suggested a genotype-specific motor-related brain activation in stroke recovery. However, recovery from aphasia in relation to BDNF genotype and language-related brain activation has received limited attention. We aimed to explore functional brain activation by BDNF genotype in individuals with chronic aphasia. Consistent with findings in healthy individuals and individuals with poststroke motor impairment, we hypothesized that, among individuals with aphasia, the presence of the Met allele of the BDNF gene is associated with reduced functional brain activation compared to noncarriers of the Met allele. Method Eighty-seven individuals with chronic stroke-induced aphasia performed a naming task during functional magnetic resonance imaging scanning and submitted blood or saliva samples for BDNF genotyping. The mean number of activated voxels was compared between groups, and group-based activation maps were directly compared. Neuropsychological testing was conducted to compare language impairment between BDNF genotype groups. The Western Aphasia Battery Aphasia Quotient (Kertesz, 2007) was included as a covariate in all analyses. Results While lesion size was comparable between groups, the amount of activation, quantified as the number of activated voxels, was significantly greater in noncarriers of the Met allele (whole brain: 98,500 vs. 28,630,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.