ReviewJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2019
Language Mapping in Aphasia.
Review in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Application of diffusion tensor imaging in the diagnosis of post-stroke aphasia: a meta-analysis and systematic review.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Pooled it
- Mapping and anatomo-surgical techniques for language preservation in brain tumours (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Review
- Semantic and Phonological Brain Networks in Older Adults: A Systematic Scoping Review.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Independent contributions of language activations in left and right temporal cortex to aphasia outcomes after stroke.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Dissociating language and thought in large language models.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2024Review
- Driving and suppressing the human language network using large language models.Nature human behaviour · 2024Article
- Quantifier processing and semantic flexibility in patients with aphasia.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Driving and suppressing the human language network using large language models.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Modality-Specificity of the Neural Correlates of Linguistic and Non-Linguistic Demand.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023Article
- Article
- Simultaneous Normalization and Compensatory Changes in Right Hemisphere Connectivity during Aphasia Therapy.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Article
- Spectral Resting-State EEG (rsEEG) in Chronic Aphasia Is Reliable, Sensitive, and Correlates With Functional Behavior.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- Distinct neural correlates of linguistic demand and non-linguistic demand.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2021Article
- Neuroplasticity in post-stroke aphasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional imaging studies of reorganization of language processing.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2021Article
- Introduction to the 2018 Research Symposium Forum.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2019Article
- Independent contributions of language activations in left and right temporal cortex to aphasia outcomes after stroke.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose Recovery from aphasia is thought to depend on neural plasticity, that is, functional reorganization of surviving brain regions such that they take on new or expanded roles in language processing. To make progress in characterizing the nature of this process, we need feasible, reliable, and valid methods for identifying language regions of the brain in individuals with aphasia. This article reviews 3 recent studies from our lab in which we have developed and validated several novel functional magnetic resonance imaging paradigms for language mapping in aphasia. Method In the 1st study, we investigated the reliability and validity of 4 language mapping paradigms in neurologically normal older adults. In the 2nd study, we developed a novel adaptive semantic matching paradigm and assessed its feasibility, reliability, and validity in individuals with and without aphasia. In the 3rd study, we developed and evaluated 2 additional adaptive paradigms-rhyme judgment and syllable counting-for mapping phonological encoding regions. Results We found that the adaptive semantic matching paradigm could be performed by most individuals with aphasia and yielded reliable and valid maps of core perisylvian language regions in each individual participant. The psychometric properties of this paradigm were superior to those of other commonly used paradigms such as narrative comprehension and picture naming. The adaptive rhyme judgment paradigm was capable of identifying fronto-parietal phonological encoding regions in individual participants. Conclusion Adaptive language mapping paradigms offer a promising approach for future research on the neural basis of recovery from aphasia. Presentation Video https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.10257584.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.