Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31756059›Full record

Trial reportCancer medicine2020

Similar overall survival with reduced vs. standard dose bevacizumab monotherapy in progressive glioblastoma.

Jack Patrick Gleeson, Fergus Keane, Niamh M Keegan, Emin Mammadov, Emily Harrold, Abdullah Alhusaini, Jeffrey Harte, Austin Eakin-Love, Philip J O'Halloran, Stephen MacNally and 4 more

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Molecular Biomarkers in Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jack Patrick GleesonMedical Oncology Department, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-6908-495X
Fergus KeaneMedical Oncology Department, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Niamh M KeeganMedical Oncology Department, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Emin MammadovMedical Oncology Department, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Emily HarroldMedical Oncology Department, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Abdullah AlhusainiMedical Oncology Department, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Jeffrey HarteMedical Oncology Department, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Austin Eakin-LoveRoyal College of Surgeons of Ireland (RCSI), Dublin, Ireland.
Philip J O'HalloranNeurosurgical Department, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Stephen MacNallyNeurosurgical Department, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Bryan T HennessyMedical Oncology Department, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Oscar S BreathnachMedical Oncology Department, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Liam GroganMedical Oncology Department, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Patrick G MorrisMedical Oncology Department, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBevacizumab has demonstrated activity in glioblastoma (GBM), but the true benefits and optimal dose-schedule are debated. A lower dose-schedule than standard-dose bevacizumab (10 mg/kg 2-weekly) might offer similar benefits with lower costs. At our Institution, patients are randomly assigned at time of primary diagnosis to Neuro-Oncologists, who have varying practices in terms of bevacizumab dose-schedule upon progression.

methodsIn a retrospective analysis we examined overall survival (OS), measured from first administered bevacizumab dose until death, according to dose-schedule. Patients with de novo WHO Grade IV GBM who received standard- or reduced-dose (5 mg/kg 2-weekly) bevacizumab were included. MGMT methylation status and time from diagnosis to bevacizumab start were examined as prognostic variables. Clinical benefit and a comparative cost analysis were assessed.

resultsIn total, 1127 bevacizumab doses were administered to 118 patients [Median: 7, Range: 1-44]. Median OS (mOS) was 5.8 months. 69 (59%) patients received standard-dose bevacizumab (mOS: 5.97 months) and 49 patients received reduced-dose (mOS: 5.7 months). No statistically significant difference in OS between dosing schedule was seen (HR: 1.11, P-value: .584). Patients with MGMT methylated tumors (43%) had improved OS compared to those with unmethylated tumors; 7.03 vs 4.97 months (HR: 0.61, P-value: .027). If all patients were treated with reduced-dose bevacizumab, an estimated €2.4M cost reduction would be observed.

conclusionsIn this retrospective study, reduced-dose bevacizumab schedule resulted in similar OS to standard-dose bevacizumab monotherapy with substantial cost savings. MGMT methylation appears to convey a survival benefit in the setting of bevacizumab treatment for progressive GBM.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingBevacizumabBrain NeoplasmsDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlioblastomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingBevacizumabbevacizumabcost analysisglioblastomaMGMToverall survivalreduced dose

Identifiers

PMID31756059
PMCPMC6970030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.