Trial reportCancer medicine2020
Similar overall survival with reduced vs. standard dose bevacizumab monotherapy in progressive glioblastoma.
Trial report in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Molecular Biomarkers in Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Pooled it
- Similar overall survival with reduced vs. standard dose bevacizumab monotherapy in progressive glioblastoma.Cancer medicine · 2020Trial
- Bevacizumab and Atezolizumab for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Real-world Data in Taiwan-Tainan Medical Oncology Group H01 Trial.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Trial
- Low-Dose Versus Standard-Dose Bevacizumab Plus Sintilimab for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Real-World Comparative Study of Efficacy and Safety.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
- Bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: does dose matter? Our monocentric and comparative experience.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Treatment mechanism and research progress of bevacizumab for glioblastoma.American journal of cancer research · 2025Review
- Dose and Efficacy of Bevacizumab in Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas: A Retrospective Study.Cancer management and research · 2024Article
- Dose-dependent efficacy of bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023Article
- Management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: current state of the art and emerging therapeutic approaches.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2022Review
- Natural killer cell therapy potentially enhances the antitumor effects of bevacizumab plus irinotecan in a glioblastoma mouse model.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Antitumor effect of isoquercetin on tissue vasohibin expression and colon cancer vasculature.Oncotarget · 2022Article
- Synergistic therapeutic effect of low-dose bevacizumab with cisplatin-based chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent cervical cancer.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2021Article
- Bevacizumab-based treatment as salvage therapy in patients with recurrent symptomatic brain metastases.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionBevacizumab has demonstrated activity in glioblastoma (GBM), but the true benefits and optimal dose-schedule are debated. A lower dose-schedule than standard-dose bevacizumab (10 mg/kg 2-weekly) might offer similar benefits with lower costs. At our Institution, patients are randomly assigned at time of primary diagnosis to Neuro-Oncologists, who have varying practices in terms of bevacizumab dose-schedule upon progression.
methodsIn a retrospective analysis we examined overall survival (OS), measured from first administered bevacizumab dose until death, according to dose-schedule. Patients with de novo WHO Grade IV GBM who received standard- or reduced-dose (5 mg/kg 2-weekly) bevacizumab were included. MGMT methylation status and time from diagnosis to bevacizumab start were examined as prognostic variables. Clinical benefit and a comparative cost analysis were assessed.
resultsIn total, 1127 bevacizumab doses were administered to 118 patients [Median: 7, Range: 1-44]. Median OS (mOS) was 5.8 months. 69 (59%) patients received standard-dose bevacizumab (mOS: 5.97 months) and 49 patients received reduced-dose (mOS: 5.7 months). No statistically significant difference in OS between dosing schedule was seen (HR: 1.11, P-value: .584). Patients with MGMT methylated tumors (43%) had improved OS compared to those with unmethylated tumors; 7.03 vs 4.97 months (HR: 0.61, P-value: .027). If all patients were treated with reduced-dose bevacizumab, an estimated €2.4M cost reduction would be observed.
conclusionsIn this retrospective study, reduced-dose bevacizumab schedule resulted in similar OS to standard-dose bevacizumab monotherapy with substantial cost savings. MGMT methylation appears to convey a survival benefit in the setting of bevacizumab treatment for progressive GBM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.