Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31755949›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2019

Inaugural Readmission Penalties for Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty Procedures Under the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program.

Benjamin Y Li, Kenneth L Urish, Bruce L Jacobs, Chang He, Tudor Borza, Yongmei Qin, Hye Sung Min, James M Dupree, Chad Ellimoottil, Brent K Hollenbeck and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Benjamin Y LiDow Division for Urologic Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Kenneth L UrishMagee Bone and Joint Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Bruce L JacobsDepartment of Urology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Chang HeDow Division for Urologic Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Tudor BorzaDow Division for Urologic Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Yongmei QinDow Division for Urologic Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Hye Sung MinDow Division for Urologic Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
James M DupreeDow Division for Urologic Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Chad EllimoottilDow Division for Urologic Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Brent K HollenbeckDow Division for Urologic Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Mariel S LavieriDepartment of Industrial and Operations Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Jonathan E HelmOperations and Decision Technologies, Indiana University Kelley School of Business, Bloomington.
Ted A SkolarusDow Division for Urologic Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstitutionKL2TR000146 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$8.7M
Advanced Training in Urologic OncologyT32CA180984 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Ganesh S Palapattu, VAHAKN B SHAHINIAN · 2014 to 2026
$3.4M
Major surgery in patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: effects of technology and policyR01AG048071 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HOLLENBECK, BRENT K. · 2015 to 2019
$3.0M
Enriching Claims-Based Analysis of Prostate Cancer Treatment Decision MakingR03AG048091 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JACOBS, BRUCE L. · 2014 to 2015
$228k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000146NCI NIH HHS T32 CA180984NIA NIH HHS R01 AG048071NIA NIH HHS R03 AG048091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) is a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services policy that levies hospital reimbursement penalties based on excess readmissions of patients with 4 medical conditions and 3 surgical procedures. A greater understanding of factors associated with the 3 surgical reimbursement penalties is needed for clinicians in surgical practice. Objective: To investigate the first year of HRRP readmission penalties applied to 2 surgical procedures-elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA)-in the context of hospital and patient characteristics. Design, Setting, and Participants: Fiscal year 2015 HRRP penalization data from Hospital Compare were linked with the American Hospital Association Annual Survey and with the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Database for hospitals in the state of Florida. By using a case-control framework, those hospitals were separated based on HRRP penalty severity, as measured with the HRRP THA and TKA excess readmission ratio, and compared according to orthopedic volume as well as hospital-level and patient-level characteristics. The first year of HRRP readmission penalties applied to surgery in Florida Medicare subsection (d) hospitals was examined, identifying 60 663 Medicare patients who underwent elective THA or TKA in 143 Florida hospitals. The data analysis was conducted from February 2016 to January 2017. Exposures: Annual hospital THA and TKA volume, other hospital-level characteristics, and patient factors used in HRRP risk adjustment. Main Outcomes and Measures: The HRRP penalties with HRRP excess readmission ratios were measured, and their association with annual THA and TKA volume, a common measure of surgical quality, was evaluated. The HRRP penalties for surgical care according to hospital and readmitted patient characteristics were then examined. Results: Among 143 Florida hospitals, 2991 of 60 663 Medicare patients (4.9%) who underwent THA or TKA were readmitted within 30 days. Annual hospital arthroplasty volume seemed to follow an inverse association with both unadjusted readmission rates (r = -0.16, P = .06) and HRRP risk-adjusted readmission penalties (r = -0.12, P = .14), but these associations were not statistically significant. Other hospital characteristics and readmitted patient characteristics were similar across HRRP orthopedic penalty severity. Conclusions and Relevance: This study's findings suggest that higher-volume hospitals had less severe, but not significantly different, rates of readmission and HRRP penalties, without systematic differences across readmitted patients.

Indexed as

AgedArthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeCase-Control StudiesCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.FemaleFloridaHumansMalePatient ReadmissionReimbursement MechanismsRisk AdjustmentUnited States

Identifiers

PMID31755949
PMCPMC6902819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.