ArticleJAMA network open2019
Consistency of Recommendations for Evaluation and Management of Hypertension.
Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Quality appraisal and descriptive analysis of clinical practice guidelines for self-managed non-pharmacological interventions of cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Nutrition management for patients with head and neck cancer during peri-radiotherapy: A systematic review and quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines using the AGREE II instrument.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Blood Pressure Phenotypes in Patients Recently Diagnosed With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Matched Controls: A Study in Urban Mozambique.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2026Article
- A longitudinal analysis of published clinical practice guidelines and their effect on disease burden.Nature communications · 2026Article
- A Computational Method for Systematic Comparison of Clinical Practice Guidelines.Clinical and public health guidelines · 2026Article
- Which guidelines from North America and Europe on cardiovascular risk management with statins have high utility in family medicine?Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2026Review
- Waist circumference versus BMI: A cross-sectional study comparing Cardiometabolic Risk association in the Nepalese Population.PloS one · 2026Article
- Development of a Patient-Facing Clinical Decision Support Application for Hypertension.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
- Delayed Hypertension Diagnosis and Its Association With Cardiovascular Treatment and Outcomes.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Nursing management of the neurogenic bladder: Evidence map of quality and recommendations from clinical practice guidelines.International journal of nursing sciences · 2025Review
- Determinants of adherence towards tuberculosis guidelines among Indonesian private practitioners: a qualitative study.BMJ global health · 2024Article
- Article
- Oxford consensus on primary cam morphology and femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: part 2-research priorities on conditions affecting the young person's hip.British journal of sports medicine · 2022Article
- Oxford consensus on primary cam morphology and femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: part 1-definitions, terminology, taxonomy and imaging outcomes.British journal of sports medicine · 2022Article
- Provider Perspectives on Patient- and Provider-Facing High Blood Pressure Clinical Decision Support.Applied clinical informatics · 2022Article
- Consistency of recommendations for pharmacotherapy of rheumatoid arthritis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- An Evidence Review of Low-Value Care Recommendations: Inconsistency and Lack of Economic Evidence Considered.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Review
- Assessing Data Adequacy for High Blood Pressure Clinical Decision Support: A Quantitative Analysis.Applied clinical informatics · 2021Article
- Concordance of recommendations across clinical practice guidelines for the management of hypertension in Southeast Asia with internationally reputable sources.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2021Article
- Consistency of recommendations from clinical practice guidelines for the management of critically ill COVID-19 patients.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Hypertension is very common, but guideline recommendations for hypertension have been controversial, are of increasing interest, and have profound implications. Objective: To systematically assess the consistency of recommendations regarding hypertension management across clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study of hypertension management recommendations included CPGs that had been published as of April 2018. Two point-of-care resources that provided graded recommendations were included for secondary analyses. Discrete and unambiguous specifications of the population, intervention, and comparison states were used to define a series of reference recommendations. Three raters reached consensus on coding the direction and strength of each recommendation made by each CPG. Three independent raters reached consensus on the importance of each reference recommendation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were rates of consistency for direction and strength among CPGs. Sensitivity analyses testing the robustness were conducted by excluding recommendation statements that were described as insufficient evidence, excluding single recommendation sources, and stratifying by importance of recommendations. Results: The analysis included 8 CPGs with a total of 71 reference recommendations, 68 of which had clear recommendations from 2 or more CPGs. Across CPGs, 22 recommendations (32%) were consistent in direction and strength, 18 recommendations (27%) were consistent in direction but inconsistent in strength, and 28 recommendations (41%) were inconsistent in direction. The rate of consistency was lower in secondary analyses. When insufficient evidence ratings were excluded, there was still substantial inconsistency, and a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis suggested the inconsistency could not be attributed to any single recommendation source. Inconsistency in direction was more common for recommendations deemed to be of lower importance (11 of 20 recommendations [55%]), but 17 of 48 high-importance recommendations (35%) had inconsistency in direction. Conclusions and Relevance: Hypertension is a common chronic condition with widespread expectations surrounding guideline-based care, yet CPGs have a high rate of inconsistency. Further investigations should determine the reasons for inconsistency, the implications for recommendation development, and the role of synthesis across recommendations for optimal guidance of clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.