ArticleBipolar disorders2021
Quantification of brain proton longitudinal relaxation (T
Article in Bipolar disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Lithium effects in the frontolimbic circuitry: a systematic review of neuroimaging findings in bipolar disorder.Translational psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Association between iron accumulation in the dorsal striatum and compulsive drinking in alcohol use disorder.Psychopharmacology · 2023Article
- Associations between brain volumetry and relaxometry signatures and the Edmonton Frail Scale in frailty.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021Article
- Quantification of brain proton longitudinal relaxation (TBipolar disorders · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProton longitudinal relaxation (T
methodsEuthymic patients with bipolar disorder receiving lithium (n = 18, BDL) and those on other medications but naïve to lithium (n = 20, BDC) underwent quantitative T
resultsNo significant differences in T
conclusionsThe higher T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.