Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31755127›Full record

ArticleLasers in surgery and medicine2020

Capillary Refill-The Key to Assessing Dermal Capillary Capacity and Pathology in Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.

M J Casper, J Glahn, M Evers, H Schulz-Hildebrandt, G Kositratna, R Birngruber, G Hüttmann, D Manstein

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M J CasperHarvard Medical School, Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th Street, Boston, Massachusetts, 02129.ORCID 0000-0002-6879-691X
J GlahnHarvard Medical School, Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th Street, Boston, Massachusetts, 02129.
M EversHarvard Medical School, Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th Street, Boston, Massachusetts, 02129.
H Schulz-HildebrandtInstitute of Biomedical Optics, Universität zu Lübeck, Peter-Monnik-Weg 4, Lübeck, 23562, Germany.
G KositratnaHarvard Medical School, Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th Street, Boston, Massachusetts, 02129.
R BirngruberInstitute of Biomedical Optics, Universität zu Lübeck, Peter-Monnik-Weg 4, Lübeck, 23562, Germany.
G HüttmannInstitute of Biomedical Optics, Universität zu Lübeck, Peter-Monnik-Weg 4, Lübeck, 23562, Germany.
D MansteinHarvard Medical School, Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th Street, Boston, Massachusetts, 02129.
Harvard University · USMedizinisches Laserzentrum Lübeck (Germany) · DEMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesStandard optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) has been limited to imaging blood vessels actively undergoing perfusion, providing a temporary picture of surface microvasculature. Capillary perfusion in the skin is dynamic and changes in response to the surrounding tissue's respiratory, nutritional, and thermoregulatory needs. Hence, OCTA often represents a given perfusion state without depicting the actual extent of the vascular network. Here we present a method for obtaining a more accurate anatomic representation of the surface capillary network in human skin using OCTA, along with proposing a new parameter, the Relative Capillary Capacity (RCC), a quantifiable proxy for assessing capillary dilation potential and permeability.

methodsOCTA images were captured at baseline and after compression of the skin. Baseline images display ambient capillary perfusion, while images taken upon capillary refill display the network of existing capillaries at full capacity. An optimization-based automated vessel segmentation method was used to automatically analyze and compare OCTA image sequences obtained from two volunteers. RCC was then compared with visual impressions of capillary viability.

resultsOur OCTA imaging sequence provides a method for mapping cutaneous capillary networks independent of ambient perfusion. Differences between baseline and refill images clearly demonstrate the shortcomings of standard OCTA imaging and produce the RCC biometric as a quantifiable proxy for assessing capillary dilation potential and permeability.

conclusionFuture dermatological OCTA diagnostic studies should implement the Capillary Refill Methods over standard imaging techniques and further explore the relevance of RCC to differential diagnosis and dermatopathology. Lasers Surg. Med. © The Authors. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

CapillariesTomography, Optical CoherenceFluorescein AngiographyHumansMicrovesselsSkincapillary refilling techniqueOCT angiographyoptical coherence tomographyskin condition

Identifiers

PMID31755127
PMCPMC7496142
OpenAlexW2990728334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.