Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31755096›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pathology2020

Real-time ex vivo perfusion of human lymph nodes invaded by cancer (REPLICANT): a feasibility study.

Rachel Barrow-McGee, Julia Procter, Julie Owen, Natalie Woodman, Cristina Lombardelli, Ashutosh Kothari, Tibor Kovacs, Michael Douek, Simi George, Peter A Barry and 11 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel Barrow-McGeeToby Robins Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, Breast Cancer Research Division, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Julia ProcterToby Robins Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, Breast Cancer Research Division, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Julie OwenKing's Health Partners Cancer Biobank, Guy's Comprehensive Cancer Centre, London, UK.
Natalie WoodmanKing's Health Partners Cancer Biobank, Guy's Comprehensive Cancer Centre, London, UK.
Cristina LombardelliKing's Health Partners Cancer Biobank, Guy's Comprehensive Cancer Centre, London, UK.
Ashutosh KothariGuy's and St. Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Tibor KovacsGuy's and St. Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Michael DouekSchool of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, Guy's Comprehensive Cancer Centre, London, UK.
Simi GeorgeDepartment of Cellular Pathology, Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Peter A BarryRoyal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Kelvin RamseyRoyal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Amy GibsonToby Robins Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, Breast Cancer Research Division, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Richard BuusToby Robins Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, Breast Cancer Research Division, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3386-3465
Erle HolgersenToby Robins Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, Breast Cancer Research Division, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Rachael NatrajanToby Robins Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, Breast Cancer Research Division, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9987-2946
Syed HaiderToby Robins Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, Breast Cancer Research Division, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Michael J ShattockBritish Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Cheryl GillettKing's Health Partners Cancer Biobank, Guy's Comprehensive Cancer Centre, London, UK.
Andrew Nj TuttToby Robins Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, Breast Cancer Research Division, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Sarah E PinderSchool of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, Guy's Comprehensive Cancer Centre, London, UK.
Kalnisha NaidooToby Robins Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, Breast Cancer Research Division, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2140-1191
Institute of Cancer Research · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GBKings Health Partners · GBKing's College London · GBRoyal Marsden Hospital · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/12/4/29426Cancer Research UK CRC598XNational Institute of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how breast cancer (BC) grows in axillary lymph nodes (ALNs), and refining how therapies might halt that process, is clinically important. However, modelling the complex ALN microenvironment is difficult, and no human models exist at present. We harvested ALNs from ten BC patients, and perfused them at 37 °C ex vivo for up to 24 h. Controlled autologous testing showed that ALNs remain viable after 24 h of ex vivo perfusion: haematoxylin and eosin-stained histological appearance and proliferation (by Ki67 immunohistochemistry) did not change significantly over time for any perfused ALN compared with a control from time-point zero. Furthermore, targeted gene expression analysis (NanoString PanCancer IO360 panel) showed that only 21/750 genes were differentially expressed between control and perfused ALNs (|log

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMiddle AgedPerfusionbreast cancerimmuno-oncologylymph node metastasisnormothermic perfusion

Identifiers

PMID31755096
PMCPMC7065097
OpenAlexW2990690683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.