ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2019
UCL Injury in the Non-throwing Athlete.
Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Outcomes After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction and Repair in Nonthrowing Athletes.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Ulnar collateral ligament repair and reconstruction have similar return to sport rates with low complication rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2025Review
- Review
- Incidence, management, and outcomes following elbow ulnar collateral ligament injuries in nonquarterback professional football players.JSES international · 2025Article
- Outcomes after ulnar collateral ligament injuries in non-throwing athletes: a systematic review.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2025Review
- Rehabilitation of an Upper Extremity Weight-Bearing Athlete with an Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injury: A Case Report.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2024Article
- Global elbow instability: a case report.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2023Article
- Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries in Contact Athletes.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewPrimarily reported in the overhead throwing athlete, ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries have been extensively studied since Dr. Frank Jobe first described his technique for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction on professional baseball pitcher Tommy John. While the framework for our understanding of UCL injury was initially established studying the repetitive valgus loading of the throwers' elbow, other sport-related activities in non-throwing athletes can impart similar valgus stress on the medial elbow placing the UCL at risk for injury. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the current literature on UCL injury specifically in the non-throwing athlete. RECENT
findingsIn the four decades since Dr. Jobe's seminal description of UCL reconstruction, an abundance of literature has been published on UCL injury in the throwing athlete. The evidence evaluating the UCL specifically in the non-throwing athlete, however, is quite scarce. Several small retrospective studies have demonstrated good results with high rates of return to play with focused rehabilitation and non-operative management in non-throwing athletes. Recent evidence has also demonstrated that surgical repair and/or reconstruction of the UCL in this population can produce good outcomes. The level of evidence of these published studies is low and consists primarily of case series without control groups. Further investigation is warranted to determine the optimal treatment algorithm for UCL injury in the non-throwing athlete.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.