Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31754969›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2020

Thirty-day mortality in atrial fibrillation patients with gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department: differences between direct oral anticoagulant and warfarin users.

Gianni Turcato, Antonio Bonora, Elisabetta Zorzi, Arian Zaboli, Massimo Zannoni, Giorgio Ricci, Norbert Pfeifer, Antonio Maccagnani, Andrea Tenci

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Narrative Review of Management Strategies and Risk Mitigation for Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Receiving Warfarin.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gianni TurcatoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Franz Tappeiner Hospital of Merano, Azienda Sanitaria Dell'Alto Adige, Merano, Bolzano, Italy. gianni.turcato@yahoo.it.
Antonio BonoraDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Elisabetta ZorziDepartment of Cardiology and Intensive Care Cardiology, Girolamo Fracastoro Hospital of San Bonifacio, Azienda Ospedaliera Scaligera, San Bonifacio, Verona, Italy.
Arian ZaboliDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Franz Tappeiner Hospital of Merano, Azienda Sanitaria Dell'Alto Adige, Merano, Bolzano, Italy.
Massimo ZannoniDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Giorgio RicciDepartment of Cardiology and Intensive Care Cardiology, Girolamo Fracastoro Hospital of San Bonifacio, Azienda Ospedaliera Scaligera, San Bonifacio, Verona, Italy.
Norbert PfeiferDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Franz Tappeiner Hospital of Merano, Azienda Sanitaria Dell'Alto Adige, Merano, Bolzano, Italy.
Antonio MaccagnaniDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Andrea TenciDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Girolamo Fracastoro Hospital of San Bonifacio, Azienda Ospedaliera Scaligera, San Bonifacio, Verona, Italy.
Krankenhaus Meran · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More clinical data are required on the safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Although patients treated with warfarin and DOACs have a similar risk of bleeding, short-term mortality after a gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) episode in DOAC-treated patients has not been clarified. The objective of this study was to assess differences in 30-day mortality in patients treated with DOACs or warfarin admitted to the emergency department (ED) for GIB. This was a multicentre retrospective study conducted over 2 years. The study included patients evaluated at three different EDs for GIB. The baseline characteristics were included. Subsequently, we assessed the differences in past medical history and clinical data between the two study groups (DOAC and warfarin users). Differences between the two groups were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Among the 284 patients presenting GIB enrolled in the study period, 39.4% (112/284) were treated with DOACs and 60.6% (172/284) were treated with warfarin. Overall, 8.1% (23/284) of patients died within 30 days. Among the 172 warfarin-treated patients, 8.7% (15/172) died within 30 days from ED evaluation. In the 112 DOAC-treated patients, the mortality rate was 7.1% (8/112). The Cox regression analysis, adjusted for possible clinical confounders, and the Kaplan-Meier curves did not outline differences between the two treatment groups. The present study shows no differences between DOACs and warfarin in short-term mortality after GIB.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnticoagulantsAtrial FibrillationFactor Xa InhibitorsFemaleGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansItalyMaleMortalityRetrospective StudiesStatistics, NonparametricTreatment OutcomeWarfarinAnticoagulantsFactor Xa InhibitorsWarfarinAtrial fibrillationDirect oral anticoagulantEmergency departmentGastrointestinal bleedingWarfarin

Identifiers

PMID31754969
OpenAlexW2990808337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.