Observational studyJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2020
Assessment of the peripheral microcirculation in patients with and without shock: a pilot study on different methods.
Observational study in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Assessment of fluid responsiveness using pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation, plethysmographic variability index, central venous pressure, and inferior vena cava variation in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Mechanical ventilation in ARDS: navigating the fine line with real-time monitoring.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
- Multimodal assessment of peripheral perfusion in critically ill patients: a pilot study.Annals of intensive care · 2025Article
- Macrovascular Hemodynamics and Peripheral Perfusion in Cardiogenic Shock: Exploring Current Targets and Future Directions.JACC. Advances · 2025Review
- The Predictive Value of Clinical Signs to Identify Shock in Critically Ill Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Perioperative management of adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and valve surgery: a literature review.Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2025Review
- The Prognostic Value of the Muscle Regional Oxygen Saturation Index in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The Current State of Optical Sensors in Medical Wearables.Biosensors · 2022Review
- What is new in microcirculation and tissue oxygenation monitoring?Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2022Review
- Bedside determination of microcirculatory oxygen delivery and uptake: a prospective observational clinical study for proof of principle.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Experimental Myocardial Infarction Elicits Time-Dependent Patterns of Vascular Hypoxia in Peripheral Organs and in the Brain.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microvascular dysfunction has been associated with adverse outcomes in critically ill patients, and the current concept of hemodynamic incoherence has gained attention. Our objective was to perform a comprehensive analysis of microcirculatory perfusion parameters and to investigate the best variables that could discriminate patients with and without circulatory shock during early intensive care unit (ICU) admission. This prospective observational study comprised a sample of 40 adult patients with and without circulatory shock (n = 20, each) admitted to the ICU within 24 h. Peripheral clinical [capillary refill time (CRT), peripheral perfusion index (PPI), skin-temperature gradient (Tskin-diff)] and laboratory [arterial lactate and base excess (BE)] perfusion parameters, in addition to near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)-derived variables were simultaneously assessed. While lactate, BE, CRT, PPI and Tskin-diff did not differ significantly between the groups, shock patients had lower baseline tissue oxygen saturation (StO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.