ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2020
Role of thrombin generation assays in the diagnosis of acute myocarditis and non-ST myocardial infarction.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- MXene-sensitized electrochemiluminescence sensor for thrombin activity detection and inhibitor screening.Mikrochimica acta · 2023Article
- Patients with acute and chronic coronary syndromes have elevated long-term thrombin generation.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2020Article
- Circulating Cardiac Biomarkers in Diabetes Mellitus: A New Dawn for Risk Stratification-A Narrative Review.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myocarditis and myocardial infarction share a common clinical characteristics despite significant differences in etiology and pathogenesis. Current guidelines recommend using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or endocardial biopsy for a definite diagnosis; however, these guidelines are not fully implemented due to the high cost and low availability. We used a thrombin generation assay and simple blood test to characterize both diseases. We conducted a cross-sectional study from April to December 2018. Patients with initial clinical suspicions of non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or myocarditis were eligible. All patients were recruited prior to anticoagulant treatment. Patients in both groups underwent acceptable standard clinical evaluation. Twenty-eight patients were enrolled; 12 patients in the NSTEMI group and 16 in the myocarditis group. Patients in the NSTEMI group were significantly older than those in the myocarditis group (64.25 ± 9.67 vs. 37.94 ± 19.66 years, p < 0.01, respectively) with a higher prevalence of hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and ischemic heart disease (p < 0.01 for all). There was no difference between the groups regarding INR, PT, aPTT, and serum levels of creatinine, urea, CPK, troponin, and fibrinogen. Endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), which represents the total thrombin concentration in the plasma, was significantly higher in the myocarditis group than in the NSTEMI group (2091.88 ± 336.41 vs. 1860.75 ± 438.02 nM × min, p < 0.03). Myocarditis and myocardial infarction have a different pattern of thrombin generation Thrombogram. The myocarditis group had significantly higher plasma ETP than the NSTEMI group. This finding requires further evaluation to define a numerical threshold, thus avoiding invasive or expensive assessment of myocarditis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.