Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31754893›Full record

ReviewHuman genetics2020

The current and future impact of genome-wide sequencing on fetal precision medicine.

Riwa Sabbagh, Ignatia B Van den Veyver

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. When is the best time to screen and evaluate for treatable genetic disorders?: A lifespan perspective.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Future of Blood Testing Is the Immunome.Frontiers in immunology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Riwa SabbaghDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, 1250 Moursund Street, Room 1025.14, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Ignatia B Van den VeyverDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, 1250 Moursund Street, Room 1025.14, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. iveyver@bcm.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0651-5924

Funding

Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis by Genomic Sequencing: A Prospective EvaluationR01HD055651 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Wendy K Chung, Vaidehi Jobanputra · 2007 to 2026
$16.5M
Preclinical and Clincial OutcomesP50HD103555 · NICHD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Sandesh Chakravarthy Sreenath Nagamani, David Loren Nelson · 2020 to 2026
$9.9M
Steps towards a paternal gene activation therapy for Angelman syndromeU54HD083092 · NICHD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI NELSON, DAVID LOREN, NEUL, JEFFREY L · 2014 to 2019
$7.8M
PRENATAL CYTOGENETIC DIAGNOSIS BY ARRAY-BASED COPY NUMBER ANALYSES: Follow-upU01HD055651 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WAPNER, RONALD · 2012 to 2016
$6.6M
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development R01HD055651Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development U54HD083092NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103555NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD055651NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD055651NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing and other genomic technologies are transforming prenatal and reproductive screening and testing for fetal genetic disorders at an unprecedented pace. Original approaches of screening and testing for fetal genetic and genomic disorders were focused on a few more prevalent conditions that were easily diagnosable with pre-genomic era diagnostic tools. First, chromosomal microarray analysis and then next-generation sequencing brought technology capable of more detailed genomic evaluation to prenatal genetic screening and diagnosis. This has facilitated parallel introduction of a variety of new tests on maternal blood samples, including expanded carrier screening and cell-free DNA-based non-invasive screening for fetal aneuploidy, selected copy number variants, and single-gene disorders. Genomic tests on fetal DNA samples, obtained primarily through amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling, include chromosomal microarray analysis and gene panel and exome sequencing. All these form the diagnostic pillar of the emerging field of fetal precision medicine, but their implementation is associated with ethical, counseling and healthcare resource utilization challenges. We discuss where in the reproductive and prenatal care continuum these exciting new technologies are integrated, along with associated challenges. We propose areas of priority for research to gain the data in support of their responsible implementation into clinical reproductive and prenatal care.

Indexed as

AmniocentesisChorionic Villi SamplingFemaleFetusGenetic Diseases, InbornGenetic TestingGenomeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPrecision MedicinePregnancyPrenatal CareWhole Genome Sequencing

Identifiers

PMID31754893
PMCPMC7239720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.