ReviewHuman genetics2020
The current and future impact of genome-wide sequencing on fetal precision medicine.
Review in Human genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing Prenatal Diagnosis: From Conventional Karyotyping to Genome-Wide CNV Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- Embryo and fetal gene editing: Technical challenges and progress toward clinical applications.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2024Review
- Prenatal Diagnosis by Trio Clinical Exome Sequencing: Single Center Experience.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Article
- Precision medicine in complex diseases-Molecular subgrouping for improved prediction and treatment stratification.Journal of internal medicine · 2023Review
- When is the best time to screen and evaluate for treatable genetic disorders?: A lifespan perspective.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2023Review
- Article
- Trio exome sequencing is highly relevant in prenatal diagnostics.Prenatal diagnosis · 2022Article
- The fetus in the age of the genome.Human genetics · 2022Article
- The Future of Blood Testing Is the Immunome.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- Special issue on "Feto-Maternal Genomic Medicine": a decade of incredible advances.Human genetics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing and other genomic technologies are transforming prenatal and reproductive screening and testing for fetal genetic disorders at an unprecedented pace. Original approaches of screening and testing for fetal genetic and genomic disorders were focused on a few more prevalent conditions that were easily diagnosable with pre-genomic era diagnostic tools. First, chromosomal microarray analysis and then next-generation sequencing brought technology capable of more detailed genomic evaluation to prenatal genetic screening and diagnosis. This has facilitated parallel introduction of a variety of new tests on maternal blood samples, including expanded carrier screening and cell-free DNA-based non-invasive screening for fetal aneuploidy, selected copy number variants, and single-gene disorders. Genomic tests on fetal DNA samples, obtained primarily through amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling, include chromosomal microarray analysis and gene panel and exome sequencing. All these form the diagnostic pillar of the emerging field of fetal precision medicine, but their implementation is associated with ethical, counseling and healthcare resource utilization challenges. We discuss where in the reproductive and prenatal care continuum these exciting new technologies are integrated, along with associated challenges. We propose areas of priority for research to gain the data in support of their responsible implementation into clinical reproductive and prenatal care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.