Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31754854›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2020

The current situation of canine dirofilariosis in Hungary.

Róbert Farkas, Viktória Mag, Mónika Gyurkovszky, Nóra Takács, Károly Vörös, Norbert Solymosi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026
    Article
  4. Rapid Point-of-Care Detection ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. New Insights into the Prevalence ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  12. Unusually low infection rate ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Róbert FarkasDepartment of Parasitology and Zoology, University of Veterinary Medicine, István u. 2, Budapest, H-1078, Hungary. farkas.robert@univet.hu.
Viktória MagDepartment of Parasitology and Zoology, University of Veterinary Medicine, István u. 2, Budapest, H-1078, Hungary.
Mónika GyurkovszkyDepartment of Parasitology and Zoology, University of Veterinary Medicine, István u. 2, Budapest, H-1078, Hungary.
Nóra TakácsDepartment of Parasitology and Zoology, University of Veterinary Medicine, István u. 2, Budapest, H-1078, Hungary.
Károly VörösDepartment and Clinic of Internal Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine, István u. 2, Budapest, H-1078, Hungary.
Norbert SolymosiCentre for Bioinformatics, University of Veterinary Medicine, István u. 2, Budapest, H-1078, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Between April and September 2017, blood samples were collected from 344 randomly selected dogs older than 1 year in 180 settlements of 19 counties in Hungary. The dogs lived exclusively outdoors, had never travelled and had neither been examined for Dirofilaria infection nor treated against mosquitoes with insecticides or/and filarioid worms with macrocyclic lactones. Dirofilaria infection was examined with a modified Knott's test for microfilariae, DiroCHEK®, for the presence of D. immitis antigen, as well as by multiplex and conventional PCR. Altogether, 77 (22.4%) dogs living in 58 settlements of 17 counties were found to be infected with one or both Dirofilaria species based on the PCR techniques. Twenty-eight (8.1%) and 38 (11.1%) dogs were infected with D. immitis and D. repens, respectively. Coinfections were recorded in 11 samples (3.2%) collected in 11 locations of 8 counties. The results confirmed that both dirofilarioses are endemic in dogs and the eastern areas of the country are hyperendemic for heartworm disease. Temperature showed a significant association with the prevalence of D. immitis (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.24-4.86, p = 0.012) but not with that of D. repens (OR 1.37, 95% CI 0.78-2.47, p = 0.286). The prevalence of neither D. immitis (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-1.00, p = 0.213) nor D. repens (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.99-1.01, p = 0.094) showed a significant correlation with precipitation. The number of yearly growing degree days (GDD) based on the lifecycle of Dirofilaria in mosquitoes ranged between 3.73 and 7.57 for the Hungarian districts. The GDD showed a significant positive association with the prevalence of D. immitis (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.43-4.15, p = 0.001) and a non-significant positive relationship with that of D. repens (OR 1.25, 95% CI 0.83-1.95, p = 0.291).

Indexed as

AnimalsCoinfectionCulicidaeDirofilaria immitisDirofilaria repensDirofilariasisDog DiseasesDogsHungaryPolymerase Chain ReactionPrevalenceDirofilaria immitisEnvironmental associationHungaryrepensSpatial patternSpreading

Identifiers

PMID31754854
PMCPMC6942023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.