Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31754853›Full record

SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2020

Performance of Indocyanine green for sentinel lymph node mapping and lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer: a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.

E Villegas-Tovar, J Jimenez-Lillo, V Jimenez-Valerio, A Diaz-Giron-Gidi, R Faes-Petersen, A Otero-Piñeiro, F B De Lacy, R J Martinez-Portilla, A M Lacy

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

E Villegas-TovarHospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Sabino de Arana 1, 08028, Barcelona, Spain.
J Jimenez-LilloHospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Sabino de Arana 1, 08028, Barcelona, Spain.
V Jimenez-ValerioHospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Sabino de Arana 1, 08028, Barcelona, Spain.
A Diaz-Giron-GidiHospital Médica Sur, Mexico City, Mexico.
R Faes-PetersenHospital Regional de Alta Especialidad de la Peninsula de Yucatan, Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico.
A Otero-PiñeiroHospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Sabino de Arana 1, 08028, Barcelona, Spain.
F B De LacyHospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Sabino de Arana 1, 08028, Barcelona, Spain.
R J Martinez-PortillaHospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Sabino de Arana 1, 08028, Barcelona, Spain. raifet@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4711-3857
A M LacyHospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Sabino de Arana 1, 08028, Barcelona, Spain.
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESHospital Médica Sur · MXHospital Regional de Alta Especialidad del Bajío · MXIbero American University · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndocyanine green has been widely employed as a secure and easy technique for sentinel lymph node mapping in different types of cancer. Nonetheless, the usage of Indocyanine green has not been fully implemented due to the heterogeneous results found in published studies. Thus, the objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the overall performance of Indocyanine green for sentinel lymph node mapping and node metastasis in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.

methodsAn extensive systematic search was performed to identify relevant studies in English and Spanish with no time limit restrictions. For the meta-analysis, a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve (HSROCs) was constructed, and quantitative data synthesis was performed using random effects models. Specificity, sensitivity, positive, and negative likelihood ratios were obtained from the corresponding HSROC. Between-study heterogeneity was visually evaluated using Galbraith plot, and publication bias was quantified using Deeks' method.

resultsA total of 11 studies were included for analysis. The pooled detection rate for sentinel lymph node mapping was 91% (80-98%). Covariates significantly influencing the pooled detection rate were having colon cancer (estimate: 1.3001; 1.114 to 1.486; p < 0.001) and the usage of a laparoscopic approach (estimate: 1.3495; 1.1029 to 1.5961; p < 0.001). The performance of Indocyanine green for the detection of metastatic lymph nodes yielded an area under the roc curve of 66.5%, sensitivity of 64.3% (51-76%), and specificity of 65% (36-85%).

conclusionsIndocyanine green for the detection of sentinel lymph node mapping demonstrates better accuracy when used in colonic cancer and by a laparoscopic approach. Nevertheless, its overall performance for the detection of lymph node metastasis is poor.

Indexed as

Sentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAgedColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansIndocyanine GreenLikelihood FunctionsLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedPublication BiasRegression AnalysisROC CurveSentinel Lymph NodeIndocyanine GreenColorectal cancerIndocyanine greenMeta-analysisSentinel lymph node mappingSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31754853
OpenAlexW2990871564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.