Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31754845›Full record

ReviewSports medicine - open2019

The Training and Development of Elite Sprint Performance: an Integration of Scientific and Best Practice Literature.

Thomas Haugen, Stephen Seiler, Øyvind Sandbakk, Espen Tønnessen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sports medicine - open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07329465 (Comparative Effects of Tabata Training and Periodized Resistance Training on Power, Speed and Agility in Sprinters.), which is not on this map. Cited by 147 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
147citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07329465 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Effects of Tabata Training and Periodized Resistance Training on Power, Speed and Agility in Sprinters.

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled38ConditionsSports Physical TherapyArmsPeriodized Resistance Training, Tabata Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

147 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Occlusal Splints and Exercise Performance: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in grade 2 hamstring muscle injuries: results from a randomized controlled trial.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

87 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas HaugenFaculty of Health Sciences, Kristiania University College, PB 1190 Sentrum, 0107, Oslo, Norway. thomas.haugen@kristiania.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5929-0389
Stephen SeilerFaculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, PB 422, 4604, Kristiansand, Norway.
Øyvind SandbakkCentre for Elite Sports Research, Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
Espen TønnessenFaculty of Health Sciences, Kristiania University College, PB 1190 Sentrum, 0107, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite a voluminous body of research devoted to sprint training, our understanding of the training process leading to a world-class sprint performance is limited. The objective of this review is to integrate scientific and best practice literature regarding the training and development of elite sprint performance. Sprint performance is heavily dependent upon genetic traits, and the annual within-athlete performance differences are lower than the typical variation, the smallest worthwhile change, and the influence of external conditions such as wind, monitoring methodologies, etc. Still, key underlying determinants (e.g., power, technique, and sprint-specific endurance) are trainable. In this review, we describe how well-known training principles (progression, specificity, variation/periodization, and individualization) and varying training methods (e.g., sprinting/running, technical training, strength/power, plyometric training) are used in a sprint training context. Indeed, there is a considerable gap between science and best practice in how training principles and methods are applied. While the vast majority of sprint-related studies are performed on young team sport athletes and focus on brief sprints with maximal intensity and short recoveries, elite sprinters perform sprinting/running over a broad range of distances and with varying intensity and recovery periods. Within best practice, there is a stronger link between choice of training component (i.e., modality, duration, intensity, recovery, session rate) and the intended purpose of the training session compared with the "one-size-fits-all" approach in scientific literature. This review provides a point of departure for scientists and practitioners regarding the training and development of elite sprint performance and can serve as a position statement for outlining state-of-the-art sprint training recommendations and for generation of new hypotheses to be tested in future research.

Indexed as

AccelerationMaximal velocitySprint conditioningTraining guidelinesTraining volume

Identifiers

PMID31754845
PMCPMC6872694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.