SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2020
The efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid and strontium-89 in treating non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- New insights into non-small cell lung cancer bone metastasis: mechanisms and therapies.International journal of biological sciences · 2024Review
- How zoledronic acid improves osteoporosis by acting on osteoclasts.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Targeted Palliative Radionuclide Therapy for Metastatic Bone Pain.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundZoledronic acid (ZA) and strontium-89 have been widely used to treat lung cancer with bone metastases. The authors perform this meta-analysis to better evaluate the clinical outcome of ZA and strontium-89 for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.
methodsWe carried out standard meta-analysis and network meta-analysis based on a comprehensive data retrieval of EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases (up to March 2019). Random and fixed effects models were used where indicated and between-study heterogeneity was assessed. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and skeletal-related events (SREs). The second endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR).
resultsSeven randomized clinical trials, including 1426 NSCLC patients with seven studies of zoledronic acid and two studies of strontium-89, met the inclusion criteria. Compared with the control group, ZA is associated with a OS benefit (1-year survival rate: RR = 1.76, 95% CI 1.36-2.27; and 24-month survival rate: RR = 2.38, 95% CI 1.35-4.19) and a reduction of SREs (RR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.40-0.84) for the patients with bone metastases. No statistical differences were found in PFS and ORR. Network meta-analysis for the patients with bone metastases showed that ZA + strontium-89 and ZA harbored significantly clinical benefits than strontium-89 and placebo in terms of 1-year survival rate and SREs. Both head-to-head study and network meta-analysis showed that strontium-89 had no statistical impact on OS and SREs compared with placebo.
conclusionOur analysis demonstrates that ZA +strontium-89 can be considered a priority for NSCLC patients with bone metastases, followed by ZA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.