Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31754816›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2020

Histomorphologic assessment and distribution of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) types in cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions with unusual histomorphologic features.

Helena Gutnik, Primož Kastelic, Anja Oštrbenk Valenčak, Mario Poljak, Margareta Strojan Fležar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Helena GutnikInstitute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Korytkova 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia. helena.gutnik@mf.uni-lj.si.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1482-3262
Primož KastelicInstitute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Korytkova 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Anja Oštrbenk ValenčakInstitute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Zaloška cesta 4, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Mario PoljakInstitute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Zaloška cesta 4, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Margareta Strojan FležarInstitute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Korytkova 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
University of Ljubljana · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In rare cases, equivocal histomorphology ('deceiving dysplasia') does not allow immediate diagnosis of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). We studied whether these cases are correlated with specific high-risk human papillomavirus (hr HPV) types. During 2011-2017, 39 cases of p16-positive cervical tissue biopsies with unusual ('deceiving') dysplastic histomorphology were identified and matched with the same number of controls (typical HSIL samples). Histomorphological characteristics were reviewed blindly and HPV testing was performed using the clinically validated RealTime test (Abbott) and Anyplex HPV 28 (Seegene). HPV 16 and HPV 31 were the two most frequent HPV types in both groups, although minimum, proportional, hierarchical and any etiological attribution estimates for HPV 16 were significantly lower in the deceiving group (13.2%, 21.3%, 23.7% and 23.7%) than in the control group (32.4%, 48.1%, 48.6% and 48.6%). In addition, the distribution of other hr HPV types differed between the two study groups, with five HPV types (HPV 56, 58, 59, 73 and 82) detected only in the deceiving group. Histomorphologic review of both groups (regardless of HPV type) confirmed significant differences in nuclear atypia, maximum lesion thickness and cellularity, although these were diminished when cross-comparisons between HPV16/18 and non-HPV16/18 cases pooled from both study groups were evaluated. Different attribution estimates for HPV 16, HPV 16/18 and non-16/18 hr HPV types in deceiving and control groups were observed, in particular for HPV 16. However, an unusual (deceiving) histomorphology may also depend on unknown HPV-related molecular changes.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerFemaleHuman papillomavirus 16Human papillomavirus 18HumansPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsSquamous Intraepithelial LesionsUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCervical dysplasiaCervical tissue biopsiesHigh-grade squamous intraepithelial lesionHigh-risk HPV typesHistomorphologyHPV genotyping

Identifiers

PMID31754816
OpenAlexW2991561884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.