Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31754707›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2020

Different class IIa HDACs repressive complexes regulate specific epigenetic responses related to cell survival in leiomyosarcoma cells.

Eros Di Giorgio, Emiliano Dalla, Elisa Franforte, Harikrishnareddy Paluvai, Martina Minisini, Matteo Trevisanut, Raffaella Picco, Claudio Brancolini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. HIFU-Driven Targeted Pyroptosis Therapy in Basal-Like Breast Cancer.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  5. Localization and quantification of placentalPhysiological genomics · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eros Di GiorgioDepartment of Medicine, Università degli Studi di Udine. P.le Kolbe 4, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Emiliano DallaDepartment of Medicine, Università degli Studi di Udine. P.le Kolbe 4, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Elisa FranforteDepartment of Medicine, Università degli Studi di Udine. P.le Kolbe 4, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Harikrishnareddy PaluvaiDepartment of Medicine, Università degli Studi di Udine. P.le Kolbe 4, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Martina MinisiniDepartment of Medicine, Università degli Studi di Udine. P.le Kolbe 4, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Matteo TrevisanutDepartment of Medicine, Università degli Studi di Udine. P.le Kolbe 4, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Raffaella PiccoDepartment of Medicine, Università degli Studi di Udine. P.le Kolbe 4, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Claudio BrancoliniDepartment of Medicine, Università degli Studi di Udine. P.le Kolbe 4, 33100 Udine, Italy.
University of Udine · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcriptional networks supervising class IIa HDAC expression are poorly defined. Here we demonstrate that MEF2D is the key factor controlling HDAC9 transcription. This control, which is part of a negative feed-back loop during muscle differentiation, is hijacked in cancer. In leiomyosarcomas the MEF2D/HDAC9 vicious circuit sustains proliferation and cell survival, through the repression of the death receptor FAS. Comprehensive genome-wide studies demonstrate that HDAC4 and HDAC9 control different genetic programs and show both specific and common genomic binding sites. Although the number of MEF2-target genes commonly regulated is similar, only HDAC4 represses many additional genes that are not MEF2D targets. As expected, HDAC4-/- and HDAC9-/- cells increase H3K27ac levels around the TSS of the respective repressed genes. However, these genes rarely show binding of the HDACs at their promoters. Frequently HDAC4 and HDAC9 bind intergenic regions. We demonstrate that these regions, recognized by MEF2D/HDAC4/HDAC9 repressive complexes, show the features of active enhancers. In these regions HDAC4 and HDAC9 can differentially influence H3K27 acetylation. Our studies describe new layers of class IIa HDACs regulation, including a dominant positional effect, and can contribute to explain the pleiotropic actions of MEF2 TFs.

Indexed as

AcetylationCell DifferentiationCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalEnhancer Elements, GeneticEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHistone DeacetylasesHumansLeiomyosarcomaMEF2 Transcription FactorsRepressor ProteinsHDAC4 protein, humanHDAC9 protein, humanHistone DeacetylasesMEF2D protein, humanMEF2 Transcription FactorsRepressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31754707
PMCPMC6954409
OpenAlexW2990825347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.