Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31754567›Full record

ArticleCureus2019

Use of Abdominal Binders after a Major Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Summaya Saeed, Khaled Abdullah Rage, Amjad Siraj Memon, Sarah Kazi, Khursheed Ahmed Samo, Sana Shahid, Aun Ali

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06564064 (The Effect of Abdominal Binders on Patient's Wellbeing After Cesarean Delivery), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06564064 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Abdominal Binders on Patient's Wellbeing After Cesarean Delivery :a Prospective Comparative Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSohag UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled50ConditionsEffect of Abdominal Binders on Patient ( Pain, Quality of Recovery ) After Cesaean SectionArmsabdominal binder
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Abdominal binders in postoperative care: a scoping review.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Summaya SaeedSurgery, Civil Hospital, Karachi, PAK.
Khaled Abdullah RageGeneral Surgery, Civil Hospital, Karachi, PAK.
Amjad Siraj MemonGeneral Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, PAK.
Sarah KaziObstetrics and Gynecology, Civil Hospital, Karachi, PAK.
Khursheed Ahmed SamoSurgery, Civil Hospital, Karachi, PAK.
Sana ShahidSurgery, Civil Hospital, Karachi, PAK.
Aun AliSurgery, Fazaia Ruth Pfau Medical College (FRPMC), Karachi, PAK.
Dow University of Health Sciences · PKCivil Hospital Karachi · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective To compare the effect of abdominal binder versus no binder after major abdominal surgery and cesarean section on various post-operative recovery parameters. Materials and methods This is a randomized controlled trial conducted at the Department of General Surgery and Obstetrics, Civil Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. All those patients aged ≥18 years having abdominal surgery including elective and emergency abdominal surgery and cesarean sections with American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I-III were included in the study. Randomization was done using the sealed envelope method by the principal investigator. The intervention group wore an abdominal binder postoperatively while the control group did not use it. Mobilization and the pain status of both groups were evaluated on the first, fourth, and seventh days after surgery. Results Primary outcome variables were mobility, assessed via 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and postoperative pain, evaluated via visual analogue scale. There was no statistically significant difference in the 6MWT distance before (p = 0.278) and on postoperative day one of the surgery (p = 0.0762). However, the difference was significant on fourth (p < 0.001) and seventh day (p value < 0.001). With regards to the pain status, patients in the binder group reported significantly less postoperative pain on first, fourth, and seventh (p value < 0.001) day compared to the non-binder group. Conclusion The use of abdominal binder postoperatively significantly reduced pain and improved mobility in both obstetric and surgery patients.

Indexed as

6-minute walking testabdominal binderabdominal surgeryamerican society of anesthesiologists classificationpostoperative dayvisual analogue scale

Identifiers

PMID31754567
PMCPMC6827701
OpenAlexW2978596020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.