ArticleSA journal of radiology2019
Imaging findings of penetrating spinal cord injuries secondary to stab wounds on magnetic resonance imaging in a tertiary trauma unit, South Africa.
Article in SA journal of radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Inner and outer penetrating spinal cord injuries lead to distinct overground walking in mice.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Role of Whole-Body Computed Tomography Scan to Avoid Missed Foreign Body in Patients with Multiple Stab Injury: A Rare Case of Retained Impaled Knife Blade with Intact Neurology.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2022Article
- The role of tertiary neurosurgical intervention in non-missile penetrating injuries of the spine.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn South Africa, the leading cause of spinal cord injuries is motor vehicle accidents, followed by violence-related injuries, including gunshot injuries and stab wounds. Controversy regarding management persists. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard to rule out surgical causes of neurological deficit.
objectivesTo determine the spectrum of imaging findings in penetrating spinal cord injuries, specifically related to stab wounds, in a Tertiary Academic Hospital in the Free State province and whether these imaging findings influenced immediate surgical decision-making and outcomes of patients.
methodConsecutive sampling was used to retrospectively select patients who presented with spinal penetrating injuries secondary to stab wounds during the period 01 August 2013-30 September 2016 and received MRI investigation. Fifty-six patients were included. Magnetic resonance imaging investigations were reviewed by the authors, with documentation of MRI findings, relevant patient demographics and clinical information into Excel spread sheets. Statistical analysis was performed by the Biostatistics Department of the University of the Free State.
resultsThe most common MRI finding was a high signal intensity wound tract (96.6%), followed by cord signal changes (91.1%) and cord oedema (82.1%). Thirty-nine extra-axial collections were diagnosed in 30 penetrating injuries, of which only one had spinal compressive effects. Four patients (7.1%) demonstrated pseudo-meningoceles. None of the included patients had an indication for emergency spinal surgery on review of imaging.
conclusionMagnetic resonance imaging findings did not alter the surgical course of action in our study patients. Despite this, MRI is a valuable modality in evaluation of penetrating spinal cord injuries in the post-traumatic phase (<24 h) for the presence of pseudo-meningoceles that pose an infection and delayed complication risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.