ReviewSA journal of radiology2018
Understanding indications and defining guidelines for breast magnetic resonance imaging.
Review in SA journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The effect of pre-operative MRI on the in-breast tumor recurrence rate of patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features and Tumor-to-Nipple Distance for the Nipple-Areolar Complex Involvement of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Korean journal of radiology · 2023Pooled it
- Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) Clinical Practice Guideline.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Guideline
- Higher perfusion among breast malignant tumors than among breast benign lesions as demonstrated by diffusion-derived 'vessel density' (DDVD): a pilot study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging as a non-invasive breast cancer tool - the relevance of breast edema score: A retrospective study.World journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Clinical application of 90-gene expression test in a patient with occult breast cancer: a case report and literature review.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Review
- Racial Disparities in Preoperative Breast MRI Use and Surgical Margin Outcomes among Patients with Recently Diagnosed Breast Cancer.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2024Article
- Anti-HER2 therapy response assessment for guiding treatment (de-)escalation in early HER2-positive breast cancer using a novel deep learning radiomics model.European radiology · 2024Article
- A Narrative Review of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Breast, Lung, and Prostate Cancer.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- MRI-guided thoraco-abdominal percutaneous needle biopsy: our initial experience.European radiology · 2023Article
- Extensive review on breast cancer its etiology, progression, prognostic markers, and treatment.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023Review
- Axillary lymph node dissection plus radiotherapy may be an optimal strategy for patients with occult breast cancer.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2022Article
- Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography and tumor size assessment: a valuable tool for appropriate surgical management of breast lesions.La Radiologia medica · 2022Article
- Clinical utility of MRI in the neoadjuvant management of early-stage breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2022Article
- Breast Cancer-How Can Imaging Help?Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- A case report of breast cancer in silicone-injected breasts diagnosed by an emerging technique of contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Triple Negative Breast Cancer: A Review of Present and Future Diagnostic Modalities.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast is the most sensitive imaging modality for detecting cancer. With improved scan resolution and correctly applied clinical indications, the specificity of breast MRI has markedly improved in recent years. Current literature indicates an overall sensitivity for breast MRI of 98% - 100% and specificity of 88%. By comparison, the sensitivity and specificity for mammography is in the region of 71% and 98%, respectively. In particular, the very high negative predictive value (NPV) of breast MRI, which approaches 100%, is hugely useful in establishing absence of disease. Furthermore, the ability to accurately delineate viable cancer by way of combining both morphological and functional (contrast enhancement) capabilities means that MRI is the best tool we have in terms of local cancer staging and identifying residual or recurrent disease. The high NPV also means that breast MRI is uniquely capable of ruling out cancer or high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ in appropriate circumstances. I hope that the following guidelines that are based on those of the American College of Radiology and the European Society of Breast Imaging in addition to multiple review articles will provide some assistance to radiologists in terms of the correct indications for breast MRI. There are few formal guidelines in South Africa for the usage of breast MRI. In fact, there is a general paucity of guidelines in the international radiology world. The role of breast MRI in high-risk screening and identification of the primary in occult breast cancer is universally accepted. Thereafter, there is little consensus. By using some general guidelines, and bringing MRI into the discussion of multidisciplinary breast cancer management, good clinical practice and consistent decision-making can be established.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.