ReviewEFORT open reviews2019
Total hip arthroplasty planning.
Review in EFORT open reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.
- Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with BMI ≥ 30 kg/mJournal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Acetabular cup-native femoral head size discrepancy in primary total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis on intraoperative sizing verification.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Augmented Reality-Based Femur Registration With Head-Mounted Display and Infrared Tracking Device as Stand-Alone Navigation Tool: A Preclinical Validation Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Current Advances of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Orthopaedics: A Focus on Hip Surgery.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Evaluation of migration analysis with AI-based CT-RSA and preoperative 3D-planning in total hip arthroplasty.Acta orthopaedica · 2025Article
- Accuracy of digital templating for total hip arthroplasty: android smartphone and tablet computer versus commercial templating software.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2025Article
- Stem design affects templating adherence in total hip arthroplasty - a retrospective cohort study comparing two types of cementless short stems.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Article
- Planning Accuracy and Stem Offset Assessment in Digital Two-Dimensional Versus Three-Dimensional Planning in Cementless Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- How does the position of the pelvis and femur influence the selection of prosthesis size during 2D preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty?BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Does two dimensional templating allow for the use of reduced-size ancillaries in total hip arthroplasty?International orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Accuracy of two-dimensional digital planning in uncemented primary hip arthroplasty: monocentric analysis of eight hundred implants.International orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Determination of rotation center and diameter of femoral heads using off-the-shelf augmented reality hardware for navigation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Emerging Innovations in Preoperative Planning and Motion Analysis in Orthopedic Surgery.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Coxa valga and antetorta configuration leads to underestimation of the femoral component size: a matched case-control study of patients undergoing cementless total hip arthroplasty.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- Surgeon's Experience and Accuracy of Preoperative Digital Templating in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.Hip & pelvis · 2024Article
- Optimizing Acetabular Positioning: A Comprehensive Review of Contemporary Strategies in Total Hip Arthroplasty.Cureus · 2024Review
- Digital Templating of Hip Arthroplasty Using Microsoft PowerPoint: A Pilot Study with Technical Details.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Dynamic Acetabular Cup Orientation during Gait: A Study of Fast- and Slow-Walking Total Hip Replacement Patients.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preoperative planning is mandatory to achieve the restoration of a correct and personalized biomechanics of the hip.The radiographic review is the first and fundamental step in the planning. Limb or pelvis malpositioning during the review results in mislead planning.Correct templating is possible using three different methods: acetate templating on digital X-ray, digital 2D templating on digital X-ray and 3D digital templating on CT scan.Time efficiency, costs, reproducibility and accuracy must be considered when comparing different templating methods. Based on these parameters, acetate templating should not be abandoned; digital templating allows a permanent record of planning and can be electronically viewed by different members of surgical team; 3D templating is intrinsically more accurate. There is no evidence in the few recently published studies that 3D templating impacts positively on clinical outcomes except in difficult cases.The transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) is a reliable intraoperative soft tissue reference to set cup position.Spine-hip relations in osteoarthritic patients undergoing hip joint replacement must be considered. Cite this article:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.