Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31754306›Full record

ArticleInfection and drug resistance2019

Different Effects Of Amniotic Membrane Homogenate On The Growth Of Uropathogenic

Tina Šket, Taja Železnik Ramuta, Marjanca Starčič Erjavec, Mateja Erdani Kreft

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Biological properties and surgical applications of the human amniotic membrane.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tina ŠketInstitute of Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-0050-6629
Taja Železnik RamutaInstitute of Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-3672-7159
Marjanca Starčič ErjavecDepartment of Biology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-0200-573X
Mateja Erdani KreftInstitute of Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0001-6486-165X
University of Ljubljana · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDue to the emergence and spread of bacterial strains resistant to antibiotics, the development of new antimicrobials is imperative. The antimicrobial effect of the amniotic membrane (AM) has been explored to a limited extent so far. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe collected 12 biological samples of AM homogenates and tested their antimicrobial effect on 4 pathogens, including the clinical strain of uropathogenic

resultsOur results demonstrated that AM homogenate had a bacteriostatic effect on studied UPEC and

conclusionObtained results illustrated that AM homogenate could be a candidate for treatments and prevention of UPEC and

Indexed as

agar diffusion methodantimicrobial agentbactericidalbacteriostaticgrowth inhibitionliquid culture medium

Identifiers

PMID31754306
PMCPMC6825476
OpenAlexW2981543956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.