Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31754301›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2019

Design And Characterisation Of Novel Sorafenib-Loaded Carbon Nanotubes With Distinct Tumour-Suppressive Activity In Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Mahmoud Ma Elsayed, Mahmoud E Mostafa, Eman Alaaeldin, Hatem Aa Sarhan, Montaser ShA Shaykoon, Shady Allam, Ahmed Rh Ahmed, Bakheet Em Elsadek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Mahmoud Ma ElsayedDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-9547-2243
Mahmoud E MostafaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.
Eman AlaaeldinDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.
Hatem Aa SarhanDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.
Montaser ShA ShaykoonDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Azhar University, Assiut Branch, Assiut, Egypt.
Shady AllamDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-5633-4128
Ahmed Rh AhmedDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-2923-7012
Bakheet Em ElsadekDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Azhar University, Assiut Branch, Assiut, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-5444-0245
Al-Azhar University · EGMinia University · EGSohag University · EGDeraya UniversityKafrelsheikh University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOver the past 30 years, no consistent survival benefits have been recorded for anticancer agents of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), except for the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib (Nexavar MATERIALS AND

methodsSorafenib was loaded on functionalized CNTs through physical adsorption, and an alginate-based method was subsequently applied to microcapsulate the drug-loaded CNTs (CNTs-SFN). The therapeutic efficacy of the new formula was estimated and compared to that of conventional sorafenib, both in vitro (against HepG2 cells) and in vivo (in a DENA-induced HCC rat model).

resultsThe in vitro MTT anti-proliferative assay revealed that the drug-loaded CNTs formula was at least two-fold more cytotoxic towards HepG2 cells than was sorafenib itself. Moreover, the in vivo animal experiments proved that our innovative formula was superior to conventional sorafenib at all assessed end points. Circulating AFP-L3% was significantly decreased in the CNTs-SFN-MCs-treated group (14.0%) in comparison to that of the DENA (40.3%) and sorafenib (38.8%) groups. This superiority was further confirmed by Western blot analysis and immunofluorescence assessment of some HCC-relevant biomarkers.

conclusionOur results firmly suggest the distinctive cancer-suppressive nature of CNTs-SFN-MCs, both against HepG2 cells in vitro and in a DENA-induced HCC rat model in vivo, with a preferential superiority over conventional sorafenib.

Indexed as

Drug DesignAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorBody WeightCarcinoma, HepatocellularCell ProliferationDrug CompoundingHep G2 CellsHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationLiverLiver NeoplasmsMaleNanotubes, CarbonNiacinamideAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorNanotubes, CarbonNiacinamideSorafenibcarbon nanotubesDENAhepatocellular carcinomamicrocapsulessorafenib

Identifiers

PMID31754301
PMCPMC6825507
OpenAlexW2982159405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.