Comment on: 'Ophthalmology Specialist Trainee Survey in the United Kingdom'. The need to increase familiarity with the management of predictable cataract surgery complications via simulation-ensuring competence to improve confidence.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Simulated cataract surgery training of the non-dominant hand improves confidence and competence.Eye (London, England) · 2022
   Article
2. Cost and time resourcing for ophthalmic simulation in the UK: a Royal College of Ophthalmologists' National Survey of regional Simulation Leads in 2021.Eye (London, England) · 2022
   Article
3. Engagement with ophthalmic simulation training has increased following COVID-19 disruption-the educational culture change required?Eye (London, England) · 2021
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Response to 'Comment on: ophthalmology specialist trainee survey in the United Kingdom'.2020
• Comment on
  Ophthalmology specialist trainee survey in the United Kingdom.2019

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as