Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31754103›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Neural computations underlying strategic social decision-making in groups.

Seongmin A Park, Mariateresa Sestito, Erie D Boorman, Jean-Claude Dreher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Layers of Social Meaning: Innate, Acquired, and Deliberative Levels of Referential Signal Processing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. A Common Neural Account for Social and Nonsocial Decisions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Neural basis of prosocial behavior.Trends in neurosciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Neurocomputations of strategic behavior: From iterated to novel interactions.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science · 2022
    Review
  15. Decision neuroscience and neuroeconomics: Recent progress and ongoing challenges.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science · 2022
    Review
  16. The prefrontal cortex and (uniquely) human cooperation: a comparative perspective.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  17. The computational challenge of social learning.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Seongmin A ParkNeuroeconomics laboratory, Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod, CNRS UMR 5229, 69675, Lyon, France. seongmin.a.park@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8361-2277
Mariateresa SestitoNeuroeconomics laboratory, Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod, CNRS UMR 5229, 69675, Lyon, France.
Erie D BoormanCenter for Mind & Brain and Department of Psychology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, 95618, USA.
Jean-Claude DreherNeuroeconomics laboratory, Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod, CNRS UMR 5229, 69675, Lyon, France. dreher@isc.cnrs.fr.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When making decisions in groups, the outcome of one's decision often depends on the decisions of others, and there is a tradeoff between short-term incentives for an individual and long-term incentives for the groups. Yet, little is known about the neurocomputational mechanisms at play when weighing different utilities during repeated social interactions. Here, using model-based fMRI and Public-good-games, we find that the ventromedial prefrontal cortex encodes immediate expected rewards as individual utility while the lateral frontopolar cortex encodes group utility (i.e., pending rewards of alternative strategies beneficial for the group). When it is required to change one's strategy, these brain regions exhibited changes in functional interactions with brain regions engaged in switching strategies. Moreover, the anterior cingulate cortex and the temporoparietal junction updated beliefs about the decision of others during interactions. Together, our findings provide a neurocomputational account of how the brain dynamically computes effective strategies to make adaptive collective decisions.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBrainBrain MappingChoice BehaviorComputational BiologyDecision MakingFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleModels, NeurologicalNeuroimagingPrefrontal CortexYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31754103
PMCPMC6872737
OpenAlexW2990139868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.