Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31753890›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

The Incentives to Quit tobacco in Pregnancy (IQuiP) protocol: piloting a financial incentive-based smoking treatment for women attending substance use in pregnancy antenatal services.

Melissa A Jackson, Amanda L Brown, Amanda L Baker, Gillian S Gould, Adrian J Dunlop

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Neonatal Outcomes after Combined Opioid and Nicotine Exposure in Utero: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Melissa A JacksonSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia Mel.Jackson@health.nsw.gov.au.ORCID 0000-0002-1491-6218
Amanda L BrownSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0405-0713
Amanda L BakerSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3328-7146
Gillian S GouldSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8489-2576
Adrian J DunlopSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2394-5966

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWhile tobacco smoking prevalence is falling in many western societies, it remains elevated among high-priority cohorts. Rates up to 95% have been reported in women whose pregnancy is complicated by other substance use. In this group, the potential for poor pregnancy outcomes and adverse physical and neurobiological fetal development are elevated by tobacco smoking. Unfortunately, few targeted and effective tobacco dependence treatments exist to assist cessation in this population. The study will trial an evidence-based, multicomponent tobacco smoking treatment tailored to pregnant women who use other substances. The intervention comprises financial incentives for biochemically verified abstinence, psychotherapy delivered by drug and alcohol counsellors, and nicotine replacement therapy. It will be piloted at three government-based, primary healthcare facilities in New South Wales (NSW) and Victoria, Australia. The study will assess the feasibility and acceptability of the treatment when integrated into routine antenatal care offered by substance use in pregnancy antenatal services. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study will use a single-arm design with pre-post comparisons. One hundred clients will be recruited from antenatal clinics with a substance use in pregnancy service. Women must be <33 weeks' gestation, ≥16 years old and a current tobacco smoker. The primary outcomes are feasibility, assessed by recruitment and retention and the acceptability of addressing smoking among this population. Secondary outcomes include changes in smoking behaviours, the comparison of adverse maternal outcomes and neonatal characteristics to those of a historical control group, and a cost-consequence analysis of the intervention implementation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Protocol approval was granted by Hunter New England Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference 17/04/12/4.05), with additional ethical approval sought from the Aboriginal Health and Medical Research Council of NSW (Reference 1249/17). Findings will be disseminated via academic conferences, peer-reviewed publications and social media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (Ref: ACTRN12618000576224).

Indexed as

MotivationRewardFemaleGovernment ProgramsHumansNew South WalesPilot ProjectsPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnant PeoplePrenatal CareResearch DesignSmoking CessationTobacco ProductsTobacco SmokingTobacco Use Disordercigarette smokingcontingency managementincentivesmaternal medicinesubstance use disordertobacco

Identifiers

PMID31753890
PMCPMC6886985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.