Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31753885›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Cohort profile: the MCC-Spain follow-up on colorectal, breast and prostate cancers: study design and initial results.

Jessica Alonso-Molero, Antonio J Molina, Jose Juan Jiménez-Moleón, Beatriz Pérez-Gómez, Vicente Martin, Victor Moreno, Pilar Amiano, Eva Ardanaz, Silvia de Sanjose, Inmaculada Salcedo and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pregnancy and Birth Outcomes during the Early Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic: The MOACC-19 Cohort.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  11. Dietary Constituents: Relationship with Breast Cancer Prognostic (MCC-SPAIN Follow-Up).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Jessica Alonso-Molero *University of Cantabria - IDIVAL, Santander, Spain alonsomoleroj@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1939-8798
Antonio J Molina *Grupo de Investigación en Interacciones Gen-Ambiente y Salud (GIIGAS), Instituto de Biomedicina (IBIOMED), Universidad de León, León, Spain.
Jose Juan Jiménez-Moleón *CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Granada, Spain.
Beatriz Pérez-GómezCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4299-8214
Vicente MartinGrupo de Investigación en Interacciones Gen-Ambiente y Salud (GIIGAS), Instituto de Biomedicina (IBIOMED), Universidad de León, León, Spain.
Victor MorenoCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Granada, Spain.
Pilar AmianoCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Granada, Spain.
Eva ArdanazCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Granada, Spain.
Silvia de SanjoseCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Granada, Spain.
Inmaculada SalcedoCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Granada, Spain.
Guillermo Fernandez-TardonCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Granada, Spain.
Juan AlguacilCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Granada, Spain.
Dolores SalasCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Granada, Spain.
Rafael Marcos-GrageraCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Granada, Spain.
Maria Dolores ChirlaqueCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Granada, Spain.
Nuria AragonésCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Granada, Spain.
Gemma Castaño-VinyalsCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Granada, Spain.
Marina PollánCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Granada, Spain.
Manolis KogevinasCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Granada, Spain.
Javier LlorcaUniversity of Cantabria - IDIVAL, Santander, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSince 2016, the multicase-control study in Spain (MCC-Spain) has focused towards the identification of factors associated with cancer prognosis. Inception cohorts of patients with colorectal, breast and prostate cancers were assembled using the incident cases originally recruited.

participants2140 new cases of colorectal cancer, 1732 of breast cancer and 1112 of prostate cancer were initially recruited in 12 Spanish provinces; all cancers were incident and pathologically confirmed. Follow-up was obtained for 2097 (98%), 1685 (97%) and 1055 (94.9%) patients, respectively. FINDINGS TO DATE: Information gathered at recruitment included sociodemographic factors, medical history, lifestyle and environmental exposures. Biological samples were obtained, and 80% of patients were genotyped using a commercial exome array. The follow-up was performed by (1) reviewing medical records; (2) interviewing the patients by phone on quality of life; and (3) verifying vital status and cause of death in the Spanish National Death Index. Ninety-seven per cent of recruited patients were successfully followed up in 2017 or 2018; patient-years of follow-up were 30 914. Most colorectal cancers (52%) were at clinical stage II or lower at recruitment; 819 patients died in the follow-up and the 5-year survival was better for women (74.4%) than men (70.0%). 71% of breast cancers were diagnosed at stages I or II; 206 women with breast cancer died in the follow-up and the 5-year survival was 90.7%. 49% of prostate cancers were diagnosed at stage II and 32% at stage III; 119 patients with prostate cancer died in the follow-up and the 5-year survival was 93.7%. FUTURE PLANS: MCC-Spain has built three prospective cohorts on highly frequent cancers across Spain, allowing to investigate socioeconomic, clinical, lifestyle, environmental and genetic variables as putative prognosis factors determining survival of patients of the three cancers and the inter-relationship of these factors.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsEnvironmental ExposureFollow-Up StudiesHumansLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm StagingProstatic NeoplasmsQuality of Lifebreast cancercohortcolorectal cancerepidemiologyMCC-Spainprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID31753885
PMCPMC6887054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.