ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2019
Why researchers should share their analytic code.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Predictive modelling of brain disorders with magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review of modelling practices, transparency, and interpretability in the use of convolutional neural networks.Human brain mapping · 2023Pooled it
- The influence of journal submission guidelines on authors' reporting of statistics and use of open research practices: Five years later.Behavior research methods · 2023Pooled it
- PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2021Guideline
- Article
- On simulation reuse in healthcare applications.Simulation · 2026Article
- Promoting Data Sharing: The Moral Obligations of Public Funding Agencies.Science and engineering ethics · 2024Article
- OpenSAFELY: A platform for analysing electronic health records designed for reproducible research.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2024Article
- Optimising the use of electronic medical records for large scale research in psychiatry.Translational psychiatry · 2024Review
- Analytical code sharing practices in biomedical research.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- Releasing synthetic data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC): Guidelines and applied examples.Wellcome open research · 2024Article
- Analytical code sharing practices in biomedical research.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Reproducible variability: assessing investigator discordance across 9 research teams attempting to reproduce the same observational study.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Observational
- Care to share? Experimental evidence on code sharing behavior in the social sciences.PloS one · 2023Observational
- How often do cancer researchers make their data and code available and what factors are associated with sharing?BMC medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Software development skills for health data researchers.BMJ health & care informatics · 2022Article
- Generating high-fidelity synthetic time-to-event datasets to improve data transparency and accessibility.BMC medical research methodology · 2022Article
- Biosecurity in an age of open science.PLoS biology · 2022Article
- Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2021Article
- Continuous quality improvement in statistical code: avoiding errors and improving transparency.BMJ quality & safety · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
31753846What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.