GuidelineEuropean urology2020
EAU-ESMO Consensus Statements on the Management of Advanced and Variant Bladder Cancer-An International Collaborative Multistakeholder Effort
Guideline in European urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 89 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
89 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effects of Nursing Care for the Treatment of Patients with Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Variant Histology Bladder Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Incidence and outcome of salvage cystectomy after bladder sparing therapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of urology · 2021Pooled it
- Patient Flow and Multidisciplinary Coordination in Urothelial Carcinoma: Insights from Bulgarian Oncologists.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Asia-Pacific collaborative consensus statements on water vapor thermal therapy (Rezūm) incorporating a systematic review, a two-round Delphi survey, and a consensus meeting.Prostate international · 2026Article
- Site-specific heterogeneity in treatment response among patients with metastatic bladder cancer: implications for oligometastatic disease-a retrospective cohort study.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- [Treatment options in rare urological tumors: potential of molecular tumor boards].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Urinary bladder cancer needs more attention - recommendations for health care professionals and politicians in the European Union.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- A case report of primary mucinous adenocarcinoma of the bladder and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Molecular and immune characteristics of neuroendocrine bladder carcinoma - Implications for diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy: A review.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2025Review
- Neoadjuvant treatment patterns and biomarker selection in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- The added value of artificial intelligence using Quantib Prostate for the detection of prostate cancer at multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.La Radiologia medica · 2025Observational
- Bladder cancer variants share aggressive features including a CA125+ cell state and targetable TM4SF1 expression.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Minimally invasive surgical techniques (MISTs) for benign prostatic hyperplasia: results from a Delphi consensus project to shed light on controversial topics.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer with variant histology and/or divergent differentiation.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging in Urothelial Cancer: Current Status and Future Directions.Cancers · 2025Review
- Alterations in DNA Damage Repair Genes Before and After Neoadjuvant Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer.European urology open science · 2025Article
- Diagnosis and therapeutic strategies for primary bladder mucinous adenocarcinoma: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Multimodal prognostic models for bladder urothelial carcinoma: uroplakin III combined with serum and demographic data.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Advances in bladder preservation therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
121 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough guidelines exist for advanced and variant bladder cancer management, evidence is limited/conflicting in some areas and the optimal approach remains controversial.
objectiveTo bring together a large multidisciplinary group of experts to develop consensus statements on controversial topics in bladder cancer management.
designA steering committee compiled proposed statements regarding advanced and variant bladder cancer management which were assessed by 113 experts in a Delphi survey. Statements not reaching consensus were reviewed; those prioritised were revised by a panel of 45 experts prior to voting during a consensus conference.
settingOnline Delphi survey and consensus conference.
participantsThe European Association of Urology (EAU), the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), experts in bladder cancer management. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Statements were ranked by experts according to their level of agreement: 1-3 (disagree), 4-6 (equivocal), and 7-9 (agree). A priori (level 1) consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement and ≤15% disagreement, or vice versa. In the Delphi survey, a second analysis was restricted to stakeholder group(s) considered to have adequate expertise relating to each statement (to achieve level 2 consensus). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 116 statements were included in the Delphi survey. Of these statements, 33 (28%) achieved level 1 consensus and 49 (42%) achieved level 1 or 2 consensus. At the consensus conference, 22 of 27 (81%) statements achieved consensus. These consensus statements provide further guidance across a broad range of topics, including the management of variant histologies, the role/limitations of prognostic biomarkers in clinical decision making, bladder preservation strategies, modern radiotherapy techniques, the management of oligometastatic disease, and the evolving role of checkpoint inhibitor therapy in metastatic disease.
conclusionsThese consensus statements provide further guidance on controversial topics in advanced and variant bladder cancer management until a time when further evidence is available to guide our approach. PATIENT SUMMARY: This report summarises findings from an international, multistakeholder project organised by the EAU and ESMO. In this project, a steering committee identified areas of bladder cancer management where there is currently no good-quality evidence to guide treatment decisions. From this, they developed a series of proposed statements, 71 of which achieved consensus by a large group of experts in the field of bladder cancer. It is anticipated that these statements will provide further guidance to health care professionals and could help improve patient outcomes until a time when good-quality evidence is available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31753752What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.