Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31753737›Full record

Trial reportDrug and alcohol dependence2020

Methadone treatment of arrestees: A randomized clinical trial.

R P Schwartz, S M Kelly, S G Mitchell, K E O'Grady, A Sharma, J H Jaffe

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Extended-release naltrexone for youth with opioid use disorder.Journal of substance abuse treatment · 2021
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. A self-assessment of opioid use disorder services at a Pacific Northwest County jail.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

R P SchwartzFriends Research Institute, 1040 Park Avenue, Suite 103, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: Rschwartz@friendsresearch.org.
S M KellyFriends Research Institute, 1040 Park Avenue, Suite 103, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: skelly@friendsresearch.org.
S G MitchellFriends Research Institute, 1040 Park Avenue, Suite 103, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: smitchell@friendsresearch.org.
K E O'GradyDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA. Electronic address: ogrady@umd.edu.
A SharmaFriends Research Institute, 1040 Park Avenue, Suite 103, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: asharma@friendsresearch.org.
J H JaffeFriends Research Institute, 1040 Park Avenue, Suite 103, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: jhjaffe@aol.com.

Funding

A Randomized Trial of Interim Methadone and Patient Navigation Initiated in JailU01DA013636 · NIDA · FRIENDS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC. · PI SCHWARTZ, ROBERT P · 2013 to 2016
$2.4M
NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA013636
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpioid use disorder is common among detainees in US jails, yet methadone treatment is rarely initiated.

methodsThis is a three-group randomized controlled trial in which 225 detainees in Baltimore treated for opioid withdrawal were assigned to: (1) interim methadone (IM) with patient navigation (IM + PN); (2) IM; or (3) enhanced treatment-as-usual (ETAU). Participants in both IM groups were able to enter standard methadone treatment upon release, while ETAU participants received an assessment/referral number. Follow-up assessments at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-release determined treatment enrollment, urine drug testing results, self-reported days of drug use, criminal activity, and overdose events. Generalized linear mixed modelling examined two planned contrasts: (1) IM groups combined vs. ETAU; and (2) IM + PN vs. IM.

resultsOn an intention-to-treat basis, compared to ETAU, significantly more participants in the combined IM groups were in treatment 30 days post-release, while the IM + PN vs. IM groups did not significantly differ. By month 12, there were no significant differences in the estimated marginal means of enrollment in any kind of drug treatment (0.40 and 0.27 for IM + PN and IM groups, respectively, compared to 0.29 for ETAU). There were no significant differences for either contrast in opioid-positive tests, although all groups reported a sharp decrease in heroin use from baseline to follow-up. There were five fatal overdoses, but none occurred during methadone treatment.

conclusionInitiating methadone treatment in jail was effective in promoting entry into community-based drug abuse treatment but subsequent treatment discontinuation attenuated any potential impact of such treatment.

Indexed as

AdultAnalgesics, OpioidBaltimoreDrug OverdoseFemaleHumansMaleMethadoneMiddle AgedOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrisonersTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics, OpioidMethadoneCriminal justiceInterim methadone treatmentJailOpioid use disorderOverdose deathPatient navigation

Identifiers

PMID31753737
PMCPMC6980707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.