Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31753727›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2020

Ramucirumab plus docetaxel versus placebo plus docetaxel in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma after platinum-based therapy (RANGE): overall survival and updated results of a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial.

Daniel P Petrylak, Ronald de Wit, Kim N Chi, Alexandra Drakaki, Cora N Sternberg, Hiroyuki Nishiyama, Daniel Castellano, Syed A Hussain, Aude Fléchon, Aristotelis Bamias and 36 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Towards biomarker-driven therapies for urothelial carcinoma.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

46 authors.

Daniel P PetrylakYale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. Electronic address: daniel.petrylak@yale.edu.
Ronald de WitErasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Kim N ChiBritish Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Alexandra DrakakiDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Cora N SternbergSan Camillo and Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy.
Hiroyuki NishiyamaUniversity of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Daniel CastellanoHospital Universitario 12 de Octubre (CiberOnc), Madrid, Spain.
Syed A HussainDepartment of Oncology and Metabolism, Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Aude FléchonCentre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Aristotelis BamiasNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Evan Y YuUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Michiel S van der HeijdenNetherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Nobuaki MatsubaraNational Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
Boris AlekseevP.A. Herzen Moscow Oncological Research Institute, Moscow, Russia.
Andrea NecchiFondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Lajos GécziNational Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary.
Yen-Chuan OuTungs' Taichung Metro Harbor Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Hasan Senol CoskunAkdeniz University School of Medicine, Antalya, Turkey.
Wen-Pin SuInstitute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University & Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Jens BedkeDepartment of Urology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Georgios GakisDepartment of Urology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Pediatric Urology, Julius Maximillians University, Würzburg, Germany.
Ivor J PercentFlorida Cancer Specialists, Port Charlotte, FL, USA.
Jae-Lyun LeeAsan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Marcello TucciDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Andrey SemenovRBHI Ivanovo Regional Oncology Dispensary, Ivanovo, Russia.
Fredrik LaestadiusCentre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.
Avivit PeerRambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Giampaolo TortoraUniversity of Verona and Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Sufia SafinaTatarstan Regional Cancer Center, Kazan, Russia.
Xavier Garcia Del MuroInstitut Català d'Oncologia L'Hospitalet, Institut d'Investigacio Biomedica de Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Alejo Rodriguez-VidaHospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Irfan CicinTrakya University, Edirne, Turkey.
Hakan HarputluogluInonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
Scott T TagawaNew York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Ulka VaishampayanKarmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA.
Jeanny B Aragon-ChingInova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA, USA.
Oday HamidEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Astra M LiepaEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Sameera WijayawardanaEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Francesca RussoEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Richard A WalgrenEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Annamaria H ZimmermannEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Rebecca R HozakEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Katherine M Bell-McGuinnEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Thomas PowlesBarts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
RANGE study investigators

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Tumor Biology and Microenvironment (Program 1)P30CA022453 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PAUL M STEMMER · 1985 to 2026
$68.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS P30 CA022453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRamucirumab-an IgG1 vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 antagonist-plus docetaxel was previously reported to improve progression-free survival in platinum-refractory, advanced urothelial carcinoma. Here, we report the secondary endpoint of overall survival results for the RANGE trial.

methodsWe did a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial in patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who progressed during or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were enrolled from 124 investigative sites (hospitals, clinics, and academic centres) in 23 countries. Previous treatment with one immune checkpoint inhibitor was permitted. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using an interactive web response system to receive intravenous ramucirumab 10 mg/kg or placebo 10 mg/kg volume equivalent followed by intravenous docetaxel 75 mg/m

findingsBetween July 20, 2015, and April 4, 2017, 530 patients were randomly allocated to ramucirumab plus docetaxel (n=263) or placebo plus docetaxel (n=267) and comprised the intention-to-treat population. At database lock (March 21, 2018) for the final overall survival analysis, median follow-up was 7·4 months (IQR 3·5-13·9). In our sensitivity analysis of investigator-assessed progression-free survival at the overall survival database lock, median progression-free survival remained significantly improved with ramucirumab compared with placebo (4·1 months [95% CI 3·3-4·8] vs 2·8 months [2·6-2·9]; HR 0·696 [95% CI 0·573-0·845]; p=0·0002). Median overall survival was 9·4 months (95% CI 7·9-11·4) in the ramucirumab group versus 7·9 months (7·0-9·3) in the placebo group (stratified HR 0·887 [95% CI 0·724-1·086]; p=0·25). Grade 3 or worse treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in 5% or more of patients and with an incidence more than 2% higher with ramucirumab than with placebo were febrile neutropenia (24 [9%] of 258 patients in the ramucirumab group vs 16 [6%] of 265 patients in the placebo group) and neutropenia (17 [7%] of 258 vs six [2%] of 265). Serious adverse events were similar between groups (112 [43%] of 258 patients in the ramucirumab group vs 107 [40%] of 265 patients in the placebo group). Adverse events related to study treatment and leading to death occurred in eight (3%) patients in the ramucirumab group versus five (2%) patients in the placebo group.

interpretationAdditional follow-up supports that ramucirumab plus docetaxel significantly improves progression-free survival, without a significant improvement in overall survival, for patients with platinum-refractory advanced urothelial carcinoma. Clinically meaningful benefit might be restricted in an unselected population.

fundingEli Lilly and Company.

Indexed as

Salvage TherapyAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Transitional CellDocetaxelDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm MetastasisPlatinumPrognosisAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDocetaxelPlatinumRamucirumab

Identifiers

PMID31753727
PMCPMC6946880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.