ReviewTrends in biochemical sciences2020
Do All Roads Lead to Rome in G-Protein Activation?
Review in Trends in biochemical sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Heterotrimeric G protein signaling without GPCRs: The Gα-binding-and-activating (GBA) motif.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2024Review
- MoDAFold: a strategy for predicting the structure of missense mutant protein based on AlphaFold2 and molecular dynamics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Bicyclic Peptide Library Screening for the Identification of Gαi Protein Modulators.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2023Article
- Article
- Design principles of improving the dose-response alignment in coupled GTPase switches.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2023Article
- The Conformational Dynamics of Heterotrimeric G Proteins During GPCR-Mediated Activation.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2022Review
- Building unconventional G protein-coupled receptors, one block at a time.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2021Article
- Regulating cellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate: "Sources," "sinks," and now, "tunable valves".Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
High-resolution structural studies on G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have flourished recently, providing long-sought insights into the dynamic process of guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G-protein) activation. In parallel, analogous studies are starting to shed light on how the same G-proteins are activated by non-GPCR proteins. Can we learn about common themes and variations in G-protein activation from them?
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.