Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31753277›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2019

Part I: A Quantitative Study of Social Risk Screening Acceptability in Patients and Caregivers.

Emilia H De Marchis, Danielle Hessler, Caroline Fichtenberg, Nancy Adler, Elena Byhoff, Alicia J Cohen, Kelly M Doran, Stephanie Ettinger de Cuba, Eric W Fleegler, Cara C Lewis and 13 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05968716 (Addressing Unmet Social Needs Among Hospitalized Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 119 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05968716 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Addressing Unmet Social Needs Among Hospitalized Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2023 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsSocial Needs Screening, Caregiver-care Team Relationships, Social Needs Status, Child Health StatusArmsSocial needs screening protocol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Emilia H De MarchisDepartment of Family & Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. Electronic address: emilia.demarchis@ucsf.edu.
Danielle HesslerDepartment of Family & Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Caroline FichtenbergSocial Interventions Research and Evaluation Network, Center for Health and Community, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Nancy AdlerCenter for Health and Community, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Elena ByhoffDepartment of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Alicia J CohenProvidence VA Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Family Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Kelly M DoranRonald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York; Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Stephanie Ettinger de CubaDepartment of Pediatrics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Eric W FleeglerDivision of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Cara C LewisKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Stacy Tessler LindauDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Medicine-Geriatrics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Elizabeth L TungSection of General Internal Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Amy G HuebschmannDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado; Center for Women's Health Research, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Aric A PratherDepartment of Psychiatry, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Maria RavenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Nicholas GavinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.
Susan JepsonUpstream Health Innovations, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Wendy JohnsonLa Familia Medical Center, Santa Fe, New Mexico.
Eduardo OchoaDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Ardis L OlsonDepartment of Pediatrics, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire; Department of Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Megan SandelDepartment of Pediatrics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Richard S ShewardChildren's HealthWatch, Boston, Massachusetts.
Laura M GottliebDepartment of Family & Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Funding

The Institute for Translational MedicineUL1TR002389 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Joshua J Jacobs, DAVID O MELTZER · 2017 to 2026
$71.6M
Research Design, Data, and Analytics CoreP30DK092949 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ELBERT S. HUANG · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
AHRQ HHS R13 HS026664NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002389NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite recent growth in healthcare delivery-based social risk screening, little is known about patient perspectives on these activities. This study evaluates patient and caregiver acceptability of social risk screening.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional survey of 969 adult patients and adult caregivers of pediatric patients recruited from 6 primary care clinics and 4 emergency departments across 9 states. Survey items included the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation Accountable Health Communities' social risk screening tool and questions about appropriateness of screening and comfort with including social risk data in electronic health records. Logistic regressions evaluated covariate associations with acceptability measures. Data collection occurred from July 2018 to February 2019; data analyses were conducted in February‒March 2019.

resultsScreening was reported as appropriate by 79% of participants; 65% reported comfort including social risks in electronic health records. In adjusted models, higher perceived screening appropriateness was associated with previous exposure to healthcare-based social risk screening (AOR=1.82, 95% CI=1.16, 2.88), trust in clinicians (AOR=1.55, 95% CI=1.00, 2.40), and recruitment from a primary care setting (AOR=1.70, 95% CI=1.23, 2.38). Lower appropriateness was associated with previous experience of healthcare discrimination (AOR=0.66, 95% CI=0.45, 0.95). Higher comfort with electronic health record documentation was associated with previously receiving assistance with social risks in a healthcare setting (AOR=1.47, 95% CI=1.04, 2.07).

conclusionsA strong majority of adult patients and caregivers of pediatric patients reported that social risk screening was appropriate. Most also felt comfortable including social risk data in electronic health records. Although multiple factors influenced acceptability, the effects were moderate to small. These findings suggest that lack of patient acceptability is unlikely to be a major implementation barrier. SUPPLEMENT INFORMATION: This article is part of a supplement entitled Identifying and Intervening on Social Needs in Clinical Settings: Evidence and Evidence Gaps, which is sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Kaiser Permanente, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Indexed as

CaregiversElectronic Health RecordsMass ScreeningAdultChildCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMedicaidMedicareMiddle AgedPatientsPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID31753277
PMCPMC7336892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.