Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31753043›Full record

Trial reportPsychological medicine2021

Precision medicine for long-term depression outcomes using the Personalized Advantage Index approach: cognitive therapy or interpersonal psychotherapy?

Suzanne C van Bronswijk, Robert J DeRubeis, Lotte H J M Lemmens, Frenk P M L Peeters, John R Keefe, Zachary D Cohen, Marcus J H Huibers

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychological medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. What Is Precision Psychotherapy?The Journal of medicine and philosophy · 2026
    Article
  10. Targeting mechanisms of change as a path to precision psychotherapy for community settings.Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Suzanne C van BronswijkDepartment of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2983-1268
Robert J DeRubeisDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Lotte H J M LemmensDepartment of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Frenk P M L PeetersDepartment of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
John R KeefeDepartment of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA.
Zachary D CohenDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Marcus J H HuibersDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Maastricht University · NLUniversity of Pennsylvania · USCornell University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychotherapies for depression are equally effective on average, but individual responses vary widely. Outcomes can be improved by optimizing treatment selection using multivariate prediction models. A promising approach is the Personalized Advantage Index (PAI) that predicts the optimal treatment for a given individual and the magnitude of the advantage. The current study aimed to extend the PAI to long-term depression outcomes after acute-phase psychotherapy.

methodsData come from a randomized trial comparing cognitive therapy (CT, n = 76) and interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT, n = 75) for major depressive disorder (MDD). Primary outcome was depression severity, as assessed by the BDI-II, during 17-month follow-up. First, predictors and moderators were selected from 38 pre-treatment variables using a two-step machine learning approach. Second, predictors and moderators were combined into a final model, from which PAI predictions were computed with cross-validation. Long-term PAI predictions were then compared to actual follow-up outcomes and post-treatment PAI predictions.

resultsOne predictor (parental alcohol abuse) and two moderators (recent life events; childhood maltreatment) were identified. Individuals assigned to their PAI-indicated treatment had lower follow-up depression severity compared to those assigned to their PAI-non-indicated treatment. This difference was significant in two subsets of the overall sample: those whose PAI score was in the upper 60%, and those whose PAI indicated CT, irrespective of magnitude. Long-term predictions did not overlap substantially with predictions for acute benefit.

conclusionsIf replicated, long-term PAI predictions could enhance precision medicine by selecting the optimal treatment for a given depressed individual over the long term.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyInterpersonal PsychotherapyAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPrecision MedicinePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultCognitive therapydepressioninterpersonal psychotherapyprecision medicineprediction

Identifiers

PMID31753043
PMCPMC7893512
OpenAlexW2990568952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.