Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31753004›Full record

ArticleTrials2019

Promoting mental health and wellbeing in schools: examining Mindfulness, Relaxation and Strategies for Safety and Wellbeing in English primary and secondary schools: study protocol for a multi-school, cluster randomised controlled trial (INSPIRE).

Daniel Hayes, Anna Moore, Emily Stapley, Neil Humphrey, Rosie Mansfield, Joao Santos, Emma Ashworth, Praveetha Patalay, Eva-Maria Bonin, Bettina Moltrecht and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mental Health Provision in UK Secondary Schools.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Daniel HayesEvidence Based Practice Unit (EBPU), University College London and Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families (AFNCCF), The Kantor Centre of Excellence, 4-8 Rodney Street, London, N1 9JH, UK.
Anna MooreEvidence Based Practice Unit (EBPU), University College London and Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families (AFNCCF), The Kantor Centre of Excellence, 4-8 Rodney Street, London, N1 9JH, UK.
Emily StapleyEvidence Based Practice Unit (EBPU), University College London and Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families (AFNCCF), The Kantor Centre of Excellence, 4-8 Rodney Street, London, N1 9JH, UK.
Neil HumphreyManchester Institute of Education, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Rosie MansfieldManchester Institute of Education, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Joao SantosManchester Institute of Education, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Emma AshworthManchester Institute of Education, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Praveetha PatalayMRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing and the Centre for Longitudinal Studies, University College London, London, UK.
Eva-Maria BoninCare Policy and Evaluation Centre (CPEC), London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Bettina MoltrechtEvidence Based Practice Unit (EBPU), University College London and Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families (AFNCCF), The Kantor Centre of Excellence, 4-8 Rodney Street, London, N1 9JH, UK.
Jan R BoehnkeSchool of Nursing and Health Sciences (SNHS) and the Dundee Centre for Health and Related Research (DCHARR), University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Jessica DeightonEvidence Based Practice Unit (EBPU), University College London and Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families (AFNCCF), The Kantor Centre of Excellence, 4-8 Rodney Street, London, N1 9JH, UK. EBPU@annafreud.org.

Funding

Department for Education EOR/SBU/2017/015National Institute for Health Research CLAHRC North Thames at Bart's Health NHS Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are increasing rates of internalising difficulties, particularly anxiety and depression, being reported in children and young people in England. School-based, universal prevention programmes are thought to be one way of helping tackle such difficulties. This protocol describes a four-arm cluster randomised controlled trial, investigating the effectiveness of three different interventions when compared to usual provision, in English primary and secondary pupils. The primary outcome for Mindfulness and Relaxation interventions is a measure of internalising difficulties, while Strategies for Safety and Wellbeing will be examined in relation to intended help-seeking. In addition to the effectiveness analysis, a process and implementation evaluation and a cost-effectiveness evaluation will be undertaken. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Overall, 160 primary schools and 64 secondary schools will be recruited across England. This corresponds to 17,600 participants. Measures will be collected online at baseline, 3-6 months later, and 9-12 months after the commencement of the intervention. An economic evaluation will assess the cost-effectiveness of the interventions. Moreover, a process and implementation evaluation (including a qualitative research component) will explore several aspects of implementation (fidelity, quality, dosage, reach, participant responsiveness, adaptations), social validity (acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility), and their moderating effects on the outcomes of interest, and perceived impact. DISCUSSION: This trial aims to address important questions about whether schools' practices around the promotion of mental wellbeing and the prevention of mental health problems can: (1) be formalised into feasible and effective models of school-based support and (2) whether these practices and their effects can be sustained over time. Given the focus of these interventions on mirroring popular practice in schools and on prioritising approaches that present low-burden, high-acceptability to schools, if proved effective, and cost-effective, the findings will indicate models that are not only empirically tested but also offer high potential for widespread use and, therefore, potentially widespread benefits beyond the life of the trial.

trial registrationISRCTN16386254. Registered on 30 August 2018.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorChild BehaviorMental HealthMindfulnessRelaxation TherapySchool Mental Health ServicesSchoolsAdolescentAge FactorsChildEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdolescentChildrenCluster randomised controlled trialMental healthSchool-basedWellbeingYoung person

Identifiers

PMID31753004
PMCPMC6868714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.