Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31752992›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2019

Antibiotic resistance patterns of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Shigella and Vibrio isolated from chicken, pork, buffalo and goat meat in eastern Nepal.

Kamana Bantawa, Shiv Nandan Sah, Dhiren Subba Limbu, Prince Subba, Arjun Ghimire

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Isolation and antimicrobial resistance patterns ofJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. First Report on Abortion Caused byFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  19. Biocontrol ofIranian journal of veterinary research · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kamana BantawaDepartment of Microbiology, Central Campus of Technology, Tribhuvan University, Dharan, Nepal. kamnarai5@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9603-5504
Shiv Nandan SahDepartment of Microbiology, Central Campus of Technology, Tribhuvan University, Dharan, Nepal.
Dhiren Subba LimbuDepartment of Microbiology, Central Campus of Technology, Tribhuvan University, Dharan, Nepal.
Prince SubbaDepartment of Microbiology, Central Campus of Technology, Tribhuvan University, Dharan, Nepal.
Arjun GhimireDepartment of Microbiology, Central Campus of Technology, Tribhuvan University, Dharan, Nepal.
Tribhuvan University · NP

Funding

University Grants Commission- Nepal 20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFood-borne pathogens are a major cause of illnesses, death and expenses. Their occurrence in meat and other food is considered a global health problem. The burden of food-borne disease is increasing due to antimicrobial resistance which represents a greater risk of treatment failure. However, very little is known about the antibiotic resistance profile of food-borne pathogens in Nepal. This study was conducted to examine the antibiotic resistance profile of common food-borne bacterial pathogens isolated from raw meat sold in Nepal. A total of 83 meat samples were collected from the market and analyzed.

resultsThe prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Shigella, and Vibrio were 68%, 53%, 35%, 6%, and 6% respectively. The resistance of Salmonella was most frequently observed to amoxicillin (100%), tetracycline (24%), chloramphenicol (11%), and nalidixic acid (11%). S. aureus was resistant to amoxicillin (100%) followed by tetracycline (63%), nalidixic acid (17%), and cefotaxime (13%) respectively. Vibrio isolates resisted amoxicillin (100%), tetracycline (40%) and chloramphenicol (20%). Shigella expressed the highest resistance to amoxicillin (100%), followed by chloramphenicol (80%), tetracycline (60%) and nalidixic acid (20%). E. coli exhibited the highest resistance to amoxicillin (100%), followed by tetracycline (93%), nalidixic acid (25%) and cefotaxime (19%).

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBuffaloesChickensEscherichia coliFood ContaminationFood MicrobiologyGoatsMeatNepalRed MeatSalmonellaShigellaStaphylococcus aureusSwineAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic resistanceE. coliSalmonellaS. aureusShigellaVibrio

Identifiers

PMID31752992
PMCPMC6873459
OpenAlexW2990995037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.