Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31752975›Full record

Trial reportTrials2019

The effectiveness of an interactive organ donation education intervention for Dutch lower-educated students: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Esther Steenaart, Rik Crutzen, Math J J M Candel, Nanne K de Vries

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions for increasing solid organ donor registration.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Educational intervention on organ and tissue donation at UMAE No. 34].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Esther SteenaartDepartment of Health Promotion, CAPHRI Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. e.steenaart@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5195-8559
Rik CrutzenDepartment of Health Promotion, CAPHRI Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Math J J M CandelDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, CAPHRI Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Nanne K de VriesDepartment of Health Promotion, CAPHRI Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOrgan donation registration rates remain low, especially among people with lower educational levels. An interactive educational intervention was developed to prepare lower-educated students in the Netherlands for making a well-informed decision about organ donation. This article reports on the effects of this intervention on the intention to register (i.e., the primary outcome in the study at hand) and beliefs regarding organ donation. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe effectiveness was investigated in a post-test-only cluster randomized controlled trial, in which the intervention was offered to the experimental group and after measurement also to the control group. Randomization to the experimental and control groups took place at a class level. Teachers of schools for Intermediate Vocational Education who taught a course on Citizenship delivered three intervention elements (i.e., video fragments and discussion, quizzes with tailored feedback and exercise filling out a registration form) to their students during two 50-min lessons.

resultsA total of 1170 students participated in the trial and filled out a questionnaire (45 experimental and 43 control classes). Compared to the control group, students in the experimental group had higher odds of having positive registration intentions (OR = 1.81; 95%CI [1.10-2.96]), their perceived knowledge was higher (B = 0.62; 95%CI [0.23-1.01]) and they had higher intentions to talk to family members (B = 0.68; 95%CI [0.28-1.08]) and friends (B = 0.36; 95%CI [0.07-0.66]) about organ donation. There were no effects on the choice students intended to register (OR = 1.08; 95%CI [0.67-1.73]).

conclusionsProviding education in a classroom setting is an effective tool in increasing registration intentions. Despite uncertainties about the effects on actual registration behavior, a larger-scale dissemination of this intervention is recommended. Providing clear information and opening the discussion about organ donation is an important and promising first step towards higher registration rates.

trial registrationThe Dutch Trial Register, ID: NTR6771. Registered on 24 October 2017. https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/6557.

Indexed as

Educational StatusHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeTissue and Organ ProcurementVocational EducationAdolescentAltruismAttitude to DeathChoice BehaviorCultural CharacteristicsFemaleHumansInformed ConsentMaleNetherlandsProgram EvaluationStudentsAdolescentsEducation programLower educationOrgan donation registrationThe NetherlandsVocational education

Identifiers

PMID31752975
PMCPMC6873467
OpenAlexW2989654002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.